Rik Pintelon

Johan Schoukens, Mark Vaes, Rik Pintelon

This article addresses the following problems: 1) First, a nonlinearity analysis is made looking for the presence of nonlinearities in an early phase of the identification process. The level and the nature of the nonlinearities should be retrieved without a significant increase in the amount of measured data. 2) Next it is studied if it is safe to use a linear system identification approach, even if the presence of nonlinear distortions is detected. The properties of the linear system identification approach under these conditions are studied, and the reliability of the uncertainty bounds is checked. 3) Eventually, tools are provided to check how much can be gained if a nonlinear model were identified instead of a linear model. Addressing these three questions forms the outline of this article. The possibilities and pitfalls of using a linear identification framework in the presence of nonlinear distortions will be discussed and illustrated on lab-scale and industrial examples. In this article, the focus is on nonparametric and parametric black box identification methods, however the results might also be useful for physical modeling methods. Knowing the actual nonlinear distortion level can help to choose the required level of detail that is needed in the physical model. This will strongly influence the modeling effort. Also, in this case, significant time can be saved if it is known from experiments that the system behaves almost linearly. The converse is also true. If the experiments show that some (sub-)systems are highly nonlinear, it helps to focus the physical modeling effort on these critical elements.

Johan Schoukens, Rik Pintelon, Yves Rolain et al.

In this paper we show that it is possible to retrieve structural information about complex block-oriented nonlinear systems, starting from linear approximations of the nonlinear system around different setpoints.The key idea is to monitor the movements of the poles and zeros of the linearized models and to reduce the number of candidate models on the basis of these observations. Besides the well known open loop single branch Wiener-, Hammerstein-, and Wiener-Hammerstein systems, we also cover a number of more general structures like parallel (multi branch) Wiener-Hammerstein models, and closed loop block oriented models, including linear fractional representation (LFR) models.

Maarten Schoukens, Rik Pintelon, Tadeusz P. Dobrowiecki et al.

The Best Linear Approximation (BLA) framework has already proven to be a valuable tool to analyze nonlinear systems and to start the nonlinear modeling process. The existing BLA framework is limited to systems with additive (colored) noise at the output. Such a noise framework is a simplified representation of reality. Process noise can play an important role in many real-life applications. This paper generalizes the Best Linear Approximation framework to account also for the process noise, both for the open-loop and the closed-loop setting, and shows that the most important properties of the existing BLA framework remain valid. The impact of the process noise contributions on the robust BLA estimation method is also analyzed.

Maarten Schoukens, Anna Marconato, Rik Pintelon et al.

Block-oriented nonlinear models are popular in nonlinear modeling because of their advantages to be quite simple to understand and easy to use. To increase the flexibility of single branch block-oriented models, such as Hammerstein, Wiener, and Wiener-Hammerstein models, parallel block-oriented models can be considered. This paper presents a method to identify parallel Wiener-Hammerstein systems starting from input-output data only. In the first step, the best linear approximation is estimated for different input excitation levels. In the second step, the dynamics are decomposed over a number of parallel orthogonal branches. Next, the dynamics of each branch are partitioned into a linear time invariant subsystem at the input and a linear time invariant subsystem at the output. This is repeated for each branch of the model. The static nonlinear part of the model is also estimated during this step. The consistency of the proposed initialization procedure is proven. The method is validated on real-world measurements using a custom built parallel Wiener-Hammerstein test system.