Henrik Brådland

Simen Bihaug-Frøyland, Henrik Brådland

In-context learning enables large language models to adapt to new tasks, but their performance is highly sensitive to the selected examples. Finding effective demonstrations is particularly difficult in domain-specific, low-data settings where high-quality examples are scarce. We propose GRaSp, a three-stage framework for automatic in-context example optimization. By first generating a large synthetic candidate pool, then structuring it with clustering and dimensionality reduction, and finally using genetic algorithms to find the optimal in-context examples, the framework shows consistent improvements on the NER task. We also introduce a custom diversity-adaptive mutation mechanism, allowing it to transition from the initial broad inter-cluster exploration to focused intra-cluster refinement as the population converges. We evaluate GRaSp on financial named entity recognition (FiNER-139), comparing synthetic and human-annotated candidate pools across pool sizes of 500 and 5000. With non-synthetic data, GRaSp achieves 45.84% micro-F1, consistently outperforming both zero-shot and random few-shot baselines. Synthetic data matches the random baseline but does not exceed it, suggesting that distributional variety in the candidate pool is critical for generalization.

Henrik Brådland, Morten Goodwin, Per-Arne Andersen et al.

Document chunking fundamentally impacts Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) by determining how source materials are segmented before indexing. Despite evidence that Large Language Models (LLMs) are sensitive to the layout and structure of retrieved data, there is currently no framework to analyze the impact of different chunking methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel methodology that defines essential characteristics of the chunking process at three levels: intrinsic passage properties, extrinsic passage properties, and passages-document coherence. We propose HOPE (Holistic Passage Evaluation), a domain-agnostic, automatic evaluation metric that quantifies and aggregates these characteristics. Our empirical evaluations across seven domains demonstrate that the HOPE metric correlates significantly (p > 0.13) with various RAG performance indicators, revealing contrasts between the importance of extrinsic and intrinsic properties of passages. Semantic independence between passages proves essential for system performance with a performance gain of up to 56.2% in factual correctness and 21.1% in answer correctness. On the contrary, traditional assumptions about maintaining concept unity within passages show minimal impact. These findings provide actionable insights for optimizing chunking strategies, thus improving RAG system design to produce more factually correct responses.