Shweta Verma

Mingze Wu, Abhinav Anand, Shweta Verma et al.

Post-training using online reinforcement learning (RL) is an important training step for LLMs, including code-generating models. However, online RL for code generation involves LLM inference and verification of the generated output, which can take considerable time and resources. In this paper, we explore the application of offline RL to code-generating models by leveraging existing code datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that offline RL is an effective training strategy for improving LLM performance. We show that offline RL can be especially beneficial for small LLMs and challenging coding problems.

Jiali Wu, Abhinav Anand, Shweta Verma et al.

State Space Models (SSMs) have emerged as an efficient alternative to the transformer architecture. Recent studies show that SSMs can match or surpass Transformers on code understanding tasks, such as code retrieval, when trained under similar conditions. However, their internal mechanisms remain a black box. We present the first systematic analysis of what SSM-based code models actually learn and perform the first comparative analysis of SSM and Transformer-based code models. Our analysis reveals that SSMs outperform Transformers at capturing code syntax and semantics in pretraining but forgets certain syntactic and semantic relations during fine-tuning on task, especially when the task emphasizes short-range dependencies. To diagnose this, we introduce SSM-Interpret, a frequency-domain framework that exposes a spectral shift toward short-range dependencies during fine-tuning. Guided by these findings, we propose architectural modifications that significantly improve the performance of SSM-based code model, validating that our analysis directly enables better models.

Srividya Ravikumar, Abhinav Anand, Shweta Verma et al.

Although state-space models (SSMs) have demonstrated strong performance on long-sequence benchmarks, most research has emphasized predictive accuracy rather than interpretability. In this work, we present the first systematic kernel interpretability study of the diagonalized state-space model (S4D) trained on a real-world task (vulnerability detection in source code). Through time and frequency domain analysis of the S4D kernel, we show that the long-range modeling capability of S4D varies significantly under different model architectures, affecting model performance. For instance, we show that the depending on the architecture, S4D kernel can behave as low-pass, band-pass or high-pass filter. The insights from our analysis can guide future work in designing better S4D-based models.

Shweta Verma, Abhinav Anand, Mira Mezini

Although transformers dominate many code-specific tasks, they have significant limitations. This paper explores State Space Models (SSMs) as a promising alternative for code understanding tasks such as retrieval, classification, and clone detection. We introduce CodeSSM, the first SSM-based model trained on code corpora to assess its effectiveness. Our results demonstrate that SSMs are more sample-efficient and can extrapolate to longer contexts beyond the pretraining length. Extensive experiments show that SSMs offer a viable alternative to transformers, addressing several their limitations. Additionally, CodeSSM reduces memory usage by up to 64\% compared to transformers at a context length of 2048, with greater savings as context length grows.

Abhinav Anand, Shweta Verma, Krishna Narasimhan et al.

Large Language Models trained on code corpora (code-LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various coding assistance tasks. However, despite their increased size and training dataset, code-LLMs still have limitations such as suggesting codes with syntactic errors, variable misuse etc. Some studies argue that code-LLMs perform well on coding tasks because they use self-attention and hidden representations to encode relations among input tokens. However, previous works have not studied what code properties are not encoded by code-LLMs. In this paper, we conduct a fine-grained analysis of attention maps and hidden representations of code-LLMs. Our study indicates that code-LLMs only encode relations among specific subsets of input tokens. Specifically, by categorizing input tokens into syntactic tokens and identifiers, we found that models encode relations among syntactic tokens and among identifiers, but they fail to encode relations between syntactic tokens and identifiers. We also found that fine-tuned models encode these relations poorly compared to their pre-trained counterparts. Additionally, larger models with billions of parameters encode significantly less information about code than models with only a few hundred million parameters.