José Miguel-Alonso

Borja Molina-Coronado, Usue Mori, Alexander Mendiburu et al.

As in other cybersecurity areas, machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as a promising solution to detect Android malware. In this sense, many proposals employing a variety of algorithms and feature sets have been presented to date, often reporting impresive detection performances. However, the lack of reproducibility and the absence of a standard evaluation framework make these proposals difficult to compare. In this paper, we perform an analysis of 10 influential research works on Android malware detection using a common evaluation framework. We have identified five factors that, if not taken into account when creating datasets and designing detectors, significantly affect the trained ML models and their performances. In particular, we analyze the effect of (1) the presence of duplicated samples, (2) label (goodware/greyware/malware) attribution, (3) class imbalance, (4) the presence of apps that use evasion techniques and, (5) the evolution of apps. Based on this extensive experimentation, we conclude that the studied ML-based detectors have been evaluated optimistically, which justifies the good published results. Our findings also highlight that it is imperative to generate realistic experimental scenarios, taking into account the aforementioned factors, to foster the rise of better ML-based Android malware detection solutions.

Molina-Coronado B., Mori U., Mendiburu A. et al.

The rapidly evolving nature of Android apps poses a significant challenge to static batch machine learning algorithms employed in malware detection systems, as they quickly become obsolete. Despite this challenge, the existing literature pays limited attention to addressing this issue, with many advanced Android malware detection approaches, such as Drebin, DroidDet and MaMaDroid, relying on static models. In this work, we show how retraining techniques are able to maintain detector capabilities over time. Particularly, we analyze the effect of two aspects in the efficiency and performance of the detectors: 1) the frequency with which the models are retrained, and 2) the data used for retraining. In the first experiment, we compare periodic retraining with a more advanced concept drift detection method that triggers retraining only when necessary. In the second experiment, we analyze sampling methods to reduce the amount of data used to retrain models. Specifically, we compare fixed sized windows of recent data and state-of-the-art active learning methods that select those apps that help keep the training dataset small but diverse. Our experiments show that concept drift detection and sample selection mechanisms result in very efficient retraining strategies which can be successfully used to maintain the performance of the static Android malware state-of-the-art detectors in changing environments.

Borja Molina-Coronado, Antonio Ruggia, Usue Mori et al.

Malware authors have seen obfuscation as the mean to bypass malware detectors based on static analysis features. For Android, several studies have confirmed that many anti-malware products are easily evaded with simple program transformations. As opposed to these works, ML detection proposals for Android leveraging static analysis features have also been proposed as obfuscation-resilient. Therefore, it needs to be determined to what extent the use of a specific obfuscation strategy or tool poses a risk for the validity of ML malware detectors for Android based on static analysis features. To shed some light in this regard, in this article we assess the impact of specific obfuscation techniques on common features extracted using static analysis and determine whether the changes are significant enough to undermine the effectiveness of ML malware detectors that rely on these features. The experimental results suggest that obfuscation techniques affect all static analysis features to varying degrees across different tools. However, certain features retain their validity for ML malware detection even in the presence of obfuscation. Based on these findings, we propose a ML malware detector for Android that is robust against obfuscation and outperforms current state-of-the-art detectors.

Borja Molina-Coronado, Usue Mori, Alexander Mendiburu et al.

The identification of cyberattacks which target information and communication systems has been a focus of the research community for years. Network intrusion detection is a complex problem which presents a diverse number of challenges. Many attacks currently remain undetected, while newer ones emerge due to the proliferation of connected devices and the evolution of communication technology. In this survey, we review the methods that have been applied to network data with the purpose of developing an intrusion detector, but contrary to previous reviews in the area, we analyze them from the perspective of the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) process. As such, we discuss the techniques used for the capture, preparation and transformation of the data, as well as, the data mining and evaluation methods. In addition, we also present the characteristics and motivations behind the use of each of these techniques and propose more adequate and up-to-date taxonomies and definitions for intrusion detectors based on the terminology used in the area of data mining and KDD. Special importance is given to the evaluation procedures followed to assess the different detectors, discussing their applicability in current real networks. Finally, as a result of this literature review, we investigate some open issues which will need to be considered for further research in the area of network security.