Nicolás E. Stier‐Moses

Vashist Avadhanula, Omar Abdul Baki, Hamsa Bastani et al.

We describe the current content moderation strategy employed by Meta to remove policy-violating content from its platforms. Meta relies on both handcrafted and learned risk models to flag potentially violating content for human review. Our approach aggregates these risk models into a single ranking score, calibrating them to prioritize more reliable risk models. A key challenge is that violation trends change over time, affecting which risk models are most reliable. Our system additionally handles production challenges such as changing risk models and novel risk models. We use a contextual bandit to update the calibration in response to such trends. Our approach increases Meta's top-line metric for measuring the effectiveness of its content moderation strategy by 13%.

Rahul Makhijani, Parikshit Shah, Vashist Avadhanula et al.

Moderating content in social media platforms is a formidable challenge due to the unprecedented scale of such systems, which typically handle billions of posts per day. Some of the largest platforms such as Facebook blend machine learning with manual review of platform content by thousands of reviewers. Operating a large-scale human review system poses interesting and challenging methodological questions that can be addressed with operations research techniques. We investigate the problem of optimally operating such a review system at scale using ideas from queueing theory and simulation.

Christian Kroer, Alexander Peysakhovich, Eric Sodomka et al.

Computing market equilibria is an important practical problem for market design, for example in fair division of items. However, computing equilibria requires large amounts of information (typically the valuation of every buyer for every item) and computing power. We consider ameliorating these issues by applying a method used for solving complex games: constructing a coarsened abstraction of a given market, solving for the equilibrium in the abstraction, and lifting the prices and allocations back to the original market. We show how to bound important quantities such as regret, envy, Nash social welfare, Pareto optimality, and maximin share/proportionality when the abstracted prices and allocations are used in place of the real equilibrium. We then study two abstraction methods of interest for practitioners: (1) filling in unknown valuations using techniques from matrix completion, (2) reducing the problem size by aggregating groups of buyers/items into smaller numbers of representative buyers/items and solving for equilibrium in this coarsened market. We find that in real data allocations/prices that are relatively close to equilibria can be computed from even very coarse abstractions.

Tim Danford, Onur Filiz, Jing Huang et al.

This article discusses a framework to support the design and end-to-end planning of fixed millimeter-wave networks. Compared to traditional techniques, the framework allows an organization to quickly plan a deployment in a cost-effective way. We start by using LiDAR data---basically, a 3D point cloud captured from a city---to estimate potential sites to deploy antennas and whether there is line-of-sight between them. With that data on hand, we use combinatorial optimization techniques to determine the optimal set of locations and how they should communicate with each other, to satisfy engineering (e.g., latency, polarity), design (e.g., reliability) and financial (e.g., total cost of operation) constraints. The primary goal is to connect as many people as possible to the network. Our methodology can be used for strategic planning when an organization is in the process of deciding whether to adopt a millimeter-wave technology or choosing between locations, or for operational planning when conducting a detailed design of the actual network to be deployed in a selected location.