Bryan A. Moore

Max Schwarzer, Bryce Rogan, Yadong Ruan et al.

We propose a machine learning approach to address a key challenge in materials science: predicting how fractures propagate in brittle materials under stress, and how these materials ultimately fail. Our methods use deep learning and train on simulation data from high-fidelity models, emulating the results of these models while avoiding the overwhelming computational demands associated with running a statistically significant sample of simulations. We employ a graph convolutional network that recognizes features of the fracturing material and a recurrent neural network that models the evolution of these features, along with a novel form of data augmentation that compensates for the modest size of our training data. We simultaneously generate predictions for qualitatively distinct material properties. Results on fracture damage and length are within 3% of their simulated values, and results on time to material failure, which is notoriously difficult to predict even with high-fidelity models, are within approximately 15% of simulated values. Once trained, our neural networks generate predictions within seconds, rather than the hours needed to run a single simulation.

A. Hunter, B. A. Moore, M. K. Mudunuru et al.

In this paper, five different approaches for reduced-order modeling of brittle fracture in geomaterials, specifically concrete, are presented and compared. Four of the five methods rely on machine learning (ML) algorithms to approximate important aspects of the brittle fracture problem. In addition to the ML algorithms, each method incorporates different physics-based assumptions in order to reduce the computational complexity while maintaining the physics as much as possible. This work specifically focuses on using the ML approaches to model a 2D concrete sample under low strain rate pure tensile loading conditions with 20 preexisting cracks present. A high-fidelity finite element-discrete element model is used to both produce a training dataset of 150 simulations and an additional 35 simulations for validation. Results from the ML approaches are directly compared against the results from the high-fidelity model. Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed and the most important conclusion is that a combination of physics-informed and data-driven features are necessary for emulating the physics of crack propagation, interaction and coalescence. All of the models presented here have runtimes that are orders of magnitude faster than the original high-fidelity model and pave the path for developing accurate reduced order models that could be used to inform larger length-scale models with important sub-scale physics that often cannot be accounted for due to computational cost.