Shrinivas Pundlik

Junxian He, Shrinivas Pundlik, Gang Luo

Objective: Micro-navigation poses challenges for blind and visually impaired individuals. They often need to ask for sighted assistance. We explored the feasibility of utilizing ChatGPT as a virtual assistant to provide navigation directions. Methods: We created a test set of outdoor and indoor micro-navigation scenarios consisting of 113 scene images and their human-generated text descriptions. A total of 412 way-finding queries and their expected responses were compiled based on the scenarios. Not all queries are answerable based on the information available in the scene image. "I do not know"response was expected for unanswerable queries, which served as negative cases. High level orientation responses were expected, and step-by-step guidance was not required. ChatGPT 4o was evaluated based on sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) under different conditions. Results: The default ChatGPT 4o, with scene images as inputs, resulted in SEN and SPE values of 64.8% and 75.9%, respectively. Instruction on how to respond to unanswerable questions did not improve SEN substantially but SPE increased by around 14 percentage points. SEN and SPE both improved substantially, by about 17 and 16 percentage points on average respectively, when human written descriptions of the scenes were provided as input instead of images. Providing further prompt instructions to the assistants when the input was text description did not substantially change the SEN and SPE values. Conclusion: Current native ChatGPT 4o is still unable to provide correct micro-navigation guidance in some cases, probably because its scene understanding is not optimized for navigation purposes. If multi-modal chatbots could interpret scenes with a level of clarity comparable to humans, and also guided by appropriate prompts, they may have the potential to provide assistance to visually impaired for micro-navigation.

Shrinivas Pundlik, Seonggyu Choe, Patrick Baker et al.

Naturalistic driving studies use devices in participants' own vehicles to record daily driving over many months. Due to diverse and extensive amounts of data recorded, automated processing is necessary. This report describes methods to extract and characterize driver head scans at intersections from data collected from an in-car recording system that logged vehicle speed, GPS location, scene videos, and cabin videos. Custom tools were developed to mark the intersections, synchronize location and video data, and clip the cabin and scene videos for +/-100 meters from the intersection location. A custom-developed head pose detection AI model for wide angle head turns was run on the cabin videos to estimate the driver head pose, from which head scans >20 deg were computed in the horizontal direction. The scene videos were processed using a YOLO object detection model to detect traffic lights, stop signs, pedestrians, and other vehicles on the road. Turning maneuvers were independently detected using vehicle self-motion patterns. Stop lines on the road surface were detected using changing intensity patterns over time as the vehicle moved. The information obtained from processing the scene videos, along with the speed data was used in a rule-based algorithm to infer the intersection type, maneuver, and bounds. We processed 190 intersections from 3 vehicles driven in cities and suburban areas from Massachusetts and California. The automated video processing algorithm correctly detected intersection signage and maneuvers in 100% and 94% of instances, respectively. The median [IQR] error in detecting vehicle entry into the intersection was 1.1[0.4-4.9] meters and 0.2[0.1-0.54] seconds. The median overlap between ground truth and estimated intersection bounds was 0.88[0.82-0.93].