Patrick Baker

Ryan Yang, Haizhou Du, Andre Wibisono et al.

Distributed machine learning (DML) can be an important capability for modern military to take advantage of data and devices distributed at multiple vantage points to adapt and learn. The existing distributed machine learning frameworks, however, cannot realize the full benefits of DML, because they are all based on the simple linear aggregation framework, but linear aggregation cannot handle the $\textit{divergence challenges}$ arising in military settings: the learning data at different devices can be heterogeneous ($\textit{i.e.}$, Non-IID data), leading to model divergence, but the ability for devices to communicate is substantially limited ($\textit{i.e.}$, weak connectivity due to sparse and dynamic communications), reducing the ability for devices to reconcile model divergence. In this paper, we introduce a novel DML framework called aggregation in the mirror space (AIMS) that allows a DML system to introduce a general mirror function to map a model into a mirror space to conduct aggregation and gradient descent. Adapting the convexity of the mirror function according to the divergence force, AIMS allows automatic optimization of DML. We conduct both rigorous analysis and extensive experimental evaluations to demonstrate the benefits of AIMS. For example, we prove that AIMS achieves a loss of $O\left((\frac{m^{r+1}}{T})^{\frac1r}\right)$ after $T$ network-wide updates, where $m$ is the number of devices and $r$ the convexity of the mirror function, with existing linear aggregation frameworks being a special case with $r=2$. Our experimental evaluations using EMANE (Extendable Mobile Ad-hoc Network Emulator) for military communications settings show similar results: AIMS can improve DML convergence rate by up to 57\% and scale well to more devices with weak connectivity, all with little additional computation overhead compared to traditional linear aggregation.

Alexander Buck, Georgina Cosma, Iain Phillips et al.

Explainable AI (XAI) is commonly applied to anomalous sound detection (ASD) models to identify which time-frequency regions of an audio signal contribute to an anomaly decision. However, most audio explanations rely on qualitative inspection of saliency maps, leaving open the question of whether these attributions accurately reflect the spectral cues the model uses. In this work, we introduce a new quantitative framework for evaluating XAI faithfulness in machine-sound analysis by directly linking attribution relevance to model behaviour through systematic frequency-band removal. This approach provides an objective measure of whether an XAI method for machine ASD correctly identifies frequency regions that influence an ASD model's predictions. By using four widely adopted methods, namely Integrated Gradients, Occlusion, Grad-CAM and SmoothGrad, we show that XAI techniques differ in reliability, with Occlusion demonstrating the strongest alignment with true model sensitivity and gradient-+based methods often failing to accurately capture spectral dependencies. The proposed framework offers a reproducible way to benchmark audio explanations and enables more trustworthy interpretation of spectrogram-based ASD systems.

Shrinivas Pundlik, Seonggyu Choe, Patrick Baker et al.

Naturalistic driving studies use devices in participants' own vehicles to record daily driving over many months. Due to diverse and extensive amounts of data recorded, automated processing is necessary. This report describes methods to extract and characterize driver head scans at intersections from data collected from an in-car recording system that logged vehicle speed, GPS location, scene videos, and cabin videos. Custom tools were developed to mark the intersections, synchronize location and video data, and clip the cabin and scene videos for +/-100 meters from the intersection location. A custom-developed head pose detection AI model for wide angle head turns was run on the cabin videos to estimate the driver head pose, from which head scans >20 deg were computed in the horizontal direction. The scene videos were processed using a YOLO object detection model to detect traffic lights, stop signs, pedestrians, and other vehicles on the road. Turning maneuvers were independently detected using vehicle self-motion patterns. Stop lines on the road surface were detected using changing intensity patterns over time as the vehicle moved. The information obtained from processing the scene videos, along with the speed data was used in a rule-based algorithm to infer the intersection type, maneuver, and bounds. We processed 190 intersections from 3 vehicles driven in cities and suburban areas from Massachusetts and California. The automated video processing algorithm correctly detected intersection signage and maneuvers in 100% and 94% of instances, respectively. The median [IQR] error in detecting vehicle entry into the intersection was 1.1[0.4-4.9] meters and 0.2[0.1-0.54] seconds. The median overlap between ground truth and estimated intersection bounds was 0.88[0.82-0.93].