N. Oliveira

Tiago Dias, Nuno Oliveira, Norberto Sousa et al.

Cybersecurity has been a concern for quite a while now. In the latest years, cyberattacks have been increasing in size and complexity, fueled by significant advances in technology. Nowadays, there is an unavoidable necessity of protecting systems and data crucial for business continuity. Hence, many intrusion detection systems have been created in an attempt to mitigate these threats and contribute to a timelier detection. This work proposes an interpretable and explainable hybrid intrusion detection system, which makes use of artificial intelligence methods to achieve better and more long-lasting security. The system combines experts' written rules and dynamic knowledge continuously generated by a decision tree algorithm as new shreds of evidence emerge from network activity.

José Carneiro, Nuno Oliveira, Norberto Sousa et al.

With the increasing amount of reliance on digital data and computer networks by corporations and the public in general, the occurrence of cyber attacks has become a great threat to the normal functioning of our society. Intrusion detection systems seek to address this threat by preemptively detecting attacks in real time while attempting to block them or minimizing their damage. These systems can function in many ways being some of them based on artificial intelligence methods. Datasets containing both normal network traffic and cyber attacks are used for training these algorithms so that they can learn the underlying patterns of network-based data. The CIDDS-001 is one of the most used datasets for network-based intrusion detection research. Regarding this dataset, in the majority of works published so far, the Class label was used for training machine learning algorithms. However, there is another label in the CIDDS-001, AttackType, that seems very promising for this purpose and remains considerably unexplored. This work seeks to make a comparison between two machine learning models, K-Nearest Neighbours and Random Forest, which were trained with both these labels in order to ascertain whether AttackType can produce reliable results in comparison with the Class label.