Ming Jiang

h-index11
2papers
402citations

2 Papers

5.0CVJul 23, 2020Code
Leveraging Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Few-Shot Object Detection

Xianyu Chen, Ming Jiang, Qi Zhao

Few-shot object detection aims at detecting objects with few annotated examples, which remains a challenging research problem yet to be explored. Recent studies have shown the effectiveness of self-learned top-down attention mechanisms in object detection and other vision tasks. The top-down attention, however, is less effective at improving the performance of few-shot detectors. Due to the insufficient training data, object detectors cannot effectively generate attention maps for few-shot examples. To improve the performance and interpretability of few-shot object detectors, we propose an attentive few-shot object detection network (AttFDNet) that takes the advantages of both top-down and bottom-up attention. Being task-agnostic, the bottom-up attention serves as a prior that helps detect and localize naturally salient objects. We further address specific challenges in few-shot object detection by introducing two novel loss terms and a hybrid few-shot learning strategy. Experimental results and visualization demonstrate the complementary nature of the two types of attention and their roles in few-shot object detection. Codes are available at https://github.com/chenxy99/AttFDNet.

30.6CLSep 4, 2019Code
TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluation

Ming Jiang, Qiuyuan Huang, Lei Zhang et al.

This paper presents a new metric called TIGEr for the automatic evaluation of image captioning systems. Popular metrics, such as BLEU and CIDEr, are based solely on text matching between reference captions and machine-generated captions, potentially leading to biased evaluations because references may not fully cover the image content and natural language is inherently ambiguous. Building upon a machine-learned text-image grounding model, TIGEr allows to evaluate caption quality not only based on how well a caption represents image content, but also on how well machine-generated captions match human-generated captions. Our empirical tests show that TIGEr has a higher consistency with human judgments than alternative existing metrics. We also comprehensively assess the metric's effectiveness in caption evaluation by measuring the correlation between human judgments and metric scores.