Renjie Zhao

Kai-Yuan Guo, Jiang Wang, Renjie Zhao et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a key foundation for enabling personalized smart home experiences. While existing studies have explored how smart home assistants understand user queries to control devices in real time, their ability to perform memory-driven device control remains challenging from both evaluation and methodological perspectives. In terms of evaluation, existing benchmarks either focus on immediate device control or general open-domain memory retrieval tasks, and therefore cannot effectively evaluate a model's ability to perform memory-driven device control. Methodologically, while memory-driven device control can be approached using Reinforcement Learning, conventional RL methods generally rely on outcome-based supervision (i.e., whether the final task is achieved). This lack of intermediate feedback can lead to sub-optimal performance or local failures in fine-grained memory management tasks (adding, updating, deleting, and utilizing). To address these issues, we first release MemHomeLife, built from anonymized real-world long-term user interaction logs. To enable more fine-grained evaluation of different memory-related subtasks, we further construct MemHome, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate memory-driven device control in smart home scenarios.

Mingyu Zhang, Lifeng Zhuo, Tianxi Tan et al.

Humans learn by observing, interacting with environments, and internalizing physics and causality. Here, we aim to ask whether an agent can similarly acquire human-like reasoning from interaction and keep improving with more experience. We study this in a Game-to-Unseen (G2U) setting, curating 1,000+ heterogeneous games with diverse physical and causal mechanisms, and evaluate at three human-like levels: Survival, Curiosity, Utility, from primitive intuition to goal-driven reasoning. Our analysis reveals complementary failures: VLM/VLA agents reason but lack look-ahead in interactive settings, while world models imagine but imitate visual patterns rather than analyze physics and causality. We therefore propose IPR (Interactive Physical Reasoner), using world-model rollouts to score and reinforce a VLM's policy, and introduce PhysCode, a physics-centric action code aligning semantic intent with dynamics to provide a shared action space for prediction and reasoning. Pretrained on 1,000+ games, our IPR performs robustly on three levels, matches GPT-5 overall, and surpasses it on Curiosity. We find that performance improves with more training games and interaction steps, and that the model also zero-shot transfers to unseen games. These results support physics-centric interaction as a path to steadily improving physical reasoning.