Jianxiang Li

Shi Qiu, Shaoyang Guo, Zhuo-Yang Song et al.

Current benchmarks for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant limitations: task oversimplification, data contamination, and flawed evaluation items. These deficiencies necessitate more rigorous assessment methods. To address these limitations, we introduce PHYBench, a benchmark of 500 original physics problems ranging from high school to Physics Olympiad difficulty. PHYBench addresses data contamination through original content and employs a systematic curation pipeline to eliminate flawed items. Evaluations show that PHYBench activates more tokens and provides stronger differentiation between reasoning models compared to other baselines like AIME 2024, OlympiadBench and GPQA. Even the best-performing model, Gemini 2.5 Pro, achieves only 36.9% accuracy compared to human experts' 61.9%. To further enhance evaluation precision, we introduce the Expression Edit Distance (EED) Score for mathematical expression assessment, which improves sample efficiency by 204% over binary scoring. Moreover, PHYBench effectively elicits multi-step and multi-condition reasoning, providing a platform for examining models' reasoning robustness, preferences, and deficiencies. The benchmark results and dataset are publicly available at https://www.phybench.cn/.

Ruohan Li, Jianxiang Li, Bhaskar Mitra et al.

Search systems control the exposure of ranked content to searchers. In many cases, creators value not only the exposure of their content but, moreover, an understanding of the specific searches where the content is surfaced. The problem of identifying which queries expose a given piece of content in the ranking results is an important and relatively under-explored search transparency challenge. Exposing queries are useful for quantifying various issues of search bias, privacy, data protection, security, and search engine optimization. Exact identification of exposing queries in a given system is computationally expensive, especially in dynamic contexts such as web search. We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems: dense dual-encoder models and traditional BM25 models. We then propose how this approach can be improved through metric learning over the retrieval embedding space. We further derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI. Overall, our work contributes a novel conception of transparency in search systems and computational means of achieving it.

Yi Sun, Yan Tian, Yiping Xu et al.

Label noise may affect the generalization of classifiers, and the effective learning of main patterns from samples with noisy labels is an important challenge. Recent studies have shown that deep neural networks tend to prioritize the learning of simple patterns over the memorization of noise patterns. This suggests a possible method to search for the best generalization that learns the main pattern until the noise begins to be memorized. Traditional approaches often employ a clean validation set to find the best stop timing of learning, i.e., early stopping. However, the generalization performance of such methods relies on the quality of validation sets. Further, in practice, a clean validation set is sometimes difficult to obtain. To solve this problem, we propose a method that can estimate the optimal stopping timing without a clean validation set, called limited gradient descent. We modified the labels of a few samples in a noisy dataset to obtain false labels and to create a reverse pattern. By monitoring the learning progress of the noisy and reverse samples, we can determine the stop timing of learning. In this paper, we also theoretically provide some necessary conditions on learning with noisy labels. Experimental results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets demonstrate that our approach has a comparable generalization performance to methods relying on a clean validation set. Thus, on the noisy Clothing-1M dataset, our approach surpasses methods that rely on a clean validation set.