1.2MADec 6, 2019
The surprising little effectiveness of cooperative algorithms in parallel problem solvingSandro M. Reia, Larissa F. Aquino, José F. Fontanari
Biological and cultural inspired optimization algorithms are nowadays part of the basic toolkit of a great many research domains. By mimicking processes in nature and animal societies, these general-purpose search algorithms promise to deliver optimal or near-optimal solutions using hardly any information on the optimization problems they are set to tackle. Here we study the performances of a cultural-inspired algorithm -- the imitative learning search -- as well as of asexual and sexual variants of evolutionary algorithms in finding the global maxima of NK-fitness landscapes. The main performance measure is the total number of agent updates required by the algorithms to find those global maxima and the baseline performance, which establishes the effectiveness of the cooperative algorithms, is set by the blind search in which the agents explore the problem space (binary strings) by flipping bits at random. We find that even for smooth landscapes that exhibit a single maximum, the evolutionary algorithms do not perform much better than the blind search due to the stochastic effects of the genetic roulette. The imitative learning is immune to this effect thanks to the deterministic choice of the fittest string in the population, which is used as a model for imitation. The tradeoff is that for rugged landscapes the imitative learning search is more prone to be trapped in local maxima than the evolutionary algorithms. In fact, in the case of rugged landscapes with a mild density of local maxima, the blind search either beats or matches the cooperative algorithms regardless of whether the task is to find the global maximum or to find the fittest state within a given runtime.
4.3SOC-PHJun 13, 2012
Critical behavior in a cross-situational lexicon learning scenarioP. F. C. Tilles, J. F. Fontanari
The associationist account for early word-learning is based on the co-occurrence between objects and words. Here we examine the performance of a simple associative learning algorithm for acquiring the referents of words in a cross-situational scenario affected by noise produced by out-of-context words. We find a critical value of the noise parameter $γ_c$ above which learning is impossible. We use finite-size scaling to show that the sharpness of the transition persists across a region of order $τ^{-1/2}$ about $γ_c$, where $τ$ is the number of learning trials, as well as to obtain the learning error (scaling function) in the critical region. In addition, we show that the distribution of durations of periods when the learning error is zero is a power law with exponent -3/2 at the critical point.
3.3NCApr 6, 2012
Minimal model of associative learning for cross-situational lexicon acquisitionPaulo F. C. Tilles, Jose F. Fontanari
An explanation for the acquisition of word-object mappings is the associative learning in a cross-situational scenario. Here we present analytical results of the performance of a simple associative learning algorithm for acquiring a one-to-one mapping between $N$ objects and $N$ words based solely on the co-occurrence between objects and words. In particular, a learning trial in our learning scenario consists of the presentation of $C + 1 < N$ objects together with a target word, which refers to one of the objects in the context. We find that the learning times are distributed exponentially and the learning rates are given by $\ln{[\frac{N(N-1)}{C + (N-1)^{2}}]}$ in the case the $N$ target words are sampled randomly and by $\frac{1}{N} \ln [\frac{N-1}{C}] $ in the case they follow a deterministic presentation sequence. This learning performance is much superior to those exhibited by humans and more realistic learning algorithms in cross-situational experiments. We show that introduction of discrimination limitations using Weber's law and forgetting reduce the performance of the associative algorithm to the human level.
1.1CLMar 11, 2012
Categories of Emotion names in Web retrieved textsSergey Petrov, Jose F. Fontanari, Leonid I. Perlovsky
The categorization of emotion names, i.e., the grouping of emotion words that have similar emotional connotations together, is a key tool of Social Psychology used to explore people's knowledge about emotions. Without exception, the studies following that research line were based on the gauging of the perceived similarity between emotion names by the participants of the experiments. Here we propose and examine a new approach to study the categories of emotion names - the similarities between target emotion names are obtained by comparing the contexts in which they appear in texts retrieved from the World Wide Web. This comparison does not account for any explicit semantic information; it simply counts the number of common words or lexical items used in the contexts. This procedure allows us to write the entries of the similarity matrix as dot products in a linear vector space of contexts. The properties of this matrix were then explored using Multidimensional Scaling Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering. Our main findings, namely, the underlying dimension of the emotion space and the categories of emotion names, were consistent with those based on people's judgments of emotion names similarities.
1.2NCFeb 28, 2012
A structural model of emotions of cognitive dissonancesJose F. Fontanari, Marie-Claude Bonniot-Cabanac, Michel Cabanac et al.
Cognitive dissonance is the stress that comes from holding two conflicting thoughts simultaneously in the mind, usually arising when people are asked to choose between two detrimental or two beneficial options. In view of the well-established role of emotions in decision making, here we investigate whether the conventional structural models used to represent the relationships among basic emotions, such as the Circumplex model of affect, can describe the emotions of cognitive dissonance as well. We presented a questionnaire to 34 anonymous participants, where each question described a decision to be made among two conflicting motivations and asked the participants to rate analogically the pleasantness and the intensity of the experienced emotion. We found that the results were compatible with the predictions of the Circumplex model for basic emotions.