Neelofar Neelofar

Guoxiang, Guo, Kla Tantithamthavorn et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software engineering to generate and refine code. In practice, developers often continue from an initial code generation request with follow-up refinement instructions, such as requests to improve style, restructure implementation, or change the execution strategy while preserving the intended behaviour. However, existing benchmarks generally omit this multi-turn code refinement dialogue setting and therefore cannot evaluate whether LLMs maintain functional correctness, i.e., whether the refined code still passes the test suite for the original task. To address this limitation, we introduce CodeChat-Eval, an evaluation framework that constructs evaluation sessions from multi-turn code refinement dialogues using a dynamic instruction selection algorithm. Our empirical study on open-weight and proprietary LLMs observes a statistically significant decrease ranging from 19.2% (GPT-5 Nano) to 69.2% (Llama 3.1 8B) in functional correctness over multi-turn refinement. The largest correctness drops are associated with logic-level refinements and additive change requests. These findings indicate that LLMs struggle to maintain functional correctness during multi-turn code refinement dialogues, and highlight the need for benchmarks that evaluate functionality-preserving refinement beyond single-turn generation.

Guoxiang Guo, Aldeida Aleti, Neelofar Neelofar et al.

With the widespread application of LLM-based dialogue systems in daily life, quality assurance has become more important than ever. Recent research has successfully introduced methods to identify unexpected behaviour in single-turn testing scenarios. However, multi-turn interaction is the common real-world usage of dialogue systems, yet testing methods for such interactions remain underexplored. This is largely due to the oracle problem in multi-turn testing, which continues to pose a significant challenge for dialogue system developers and researchers. In this paper, we propose MORTAR, a metamorphic multi-turn dialogue testing approach, which mitigates the test oracle problem in testing LLM-based dialogue systems. MORTAR formalises the multi-turn testing for dialogue systems, and automates the generation of question-answer dialogue test cases with multiple dialogue-level perturbations and metamorphic relations (MRs). The automated MR matching mechanism allows MORTAR more flexibility and efficiency in metamorphic testing. The proposed approach is fully automated without reliance on LLM judges. In testing six popular LLM-based dialogue systems, MORTAR reaches significantly better effectiveness with over 150\% more bugs revealed per test case when compared to the single-turn metamorphic testing baseline. Regarding the quality of bugs, MORTAR reveals higher-quality bugs in terms of diversity, precision and uniqueness. MORTAR is expected to inspire more multi-turn testing approaches, and assist developers in evaluating the dialogue system performance more comprehensively with constrained test resources and budget.

Lam Nguyen Tung, Steven Cho, Xiaoning Du et al.

Machine learning (ML) for text classification has been widely used in various domains. These applications can significantly impact ethics, economics, and human behavior, raising serious concerns about trusting ML decisions. Studies indicate that conventional metrics are insufficient to build human trust in ML models. These models often learn spurious correlations and predict based on them. In the real world, their performance can deteriorate significantly. To avoid this, a common practice is to test whether predictions are reasonable based on valid patterns in the data. Along with this, a challenge known as the trustworthiness oracle problem has been introduced. Due to the lack of automated trustworthiness oracles, the assessment requires manual validation of the decision process disclosed by explanation methods. However, this is time-consuming, error-prone, and unscalable. We propose TOKI, the first automated trustworthiness oracle generation method for text classifiers. TOKI automatically checks whether the words contributing the most to a prediction are semantically related to the predicted class. Specifically, we leverage ML explanations to extract the decision-contributing words and measure their semantic relatedness with the class based on word embeddings. We also introduce a novel adversarial attack method that targets trustworthiness vulnerabilities identified by TOKI. To evaluate their alignment with human judgement, experiments are conducted. We compare TOKI with a naive baseline based solely on model confidence and TOKI-guided adversarial attack method with A2T, a SOTA adversarial attack method. Results show that relying on prediction uncertainty cannot effectively distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy predictions, TOKI achieves 142% higher accuracy than the naive baseline, and TOKI-guided attack method is more effective with fewer perturbations than A2T.