10.0DSJul 9
The matrix-vector complexity of $Ax=b$Michał Dereziński, Ethan N. Epperly, Raphael A. Meyer · berkeley
Matrix--vector algorithms, particularly Krylov subspace methods, are widely viewed as the most effective algorithms for solving large systems of linear equations. This paper establishes lower bounds on the worst-case number of matrix--vector products needed by such an algorithm to approximately solve a general linear system. The first main result is that, for any matrix--vector algorithm which is allowed the use of randomization and can perform products with both a matrix and its transpose, $Ω(κ\log(1/\varepsilon))$ matrix--vector products are necessary to solve a linear system with condition number $κ$ to accuracy $\varepsilon$, matching an upper bound for conjugate gradient on the normal equations. The second main result is that one-sided algorithms, which lack access to the transpose, must use $n$ matrix--vector products to solve an $n \times n$ linear system, even when the problem is perfectly conditioned. Both main results include explicit constants that match known upper bounds up to a factor of four. These results rigorously demonstrate the limitations of matrix--vector algorithms and confirm the optimality of widely used Krylov subspace algorithms.
8.3NAApr 2
Linear Systems and Eigenvalue Problems: Open Questions from a Simons WorkshopNoah Amsel, Yves Baumann, Paul Beckman et al. · berkeley
This document presents a series of open questions arising in matrix computations, i.e., the numerical solution of linear algebra problems. It is a result of working groups at the workshop Linear Systems and Eigenvalue Problems, which was organized at the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing program on Complexity and Linear Algebra in Fall 2025. The complexity and numerical solution of linear algebra problems is a crosscutting area between theoretical computer science and numerical analysis. The value of the particular problem formulations here is that they were produced via discussions between researchers from both groups. The open questions are organized in five categories: iterative solvers for linear systems, eigenvalue computation, low-rank approximation, randomized sketching, and other areas including tensors, quantum systems, and matrix functions.
4.5MLFeb 9
Quantifying Epistemic Uncertainty in Diffusion ModelsAditi Gupta, Raphael A. Meyer, Yotam Yaniv et al.
To ensure high quality outputs, it is important to quantify the epistemic uncertainty of diffusion models.Existing methods are often unreliable because they mix epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. We introduce a method based on Fisher information that explicitly isolates epistemic variance, producing more reliable plausibility scores for generated data. To make this approach scalable, we propose FLARE (Fisher-Laplace Randomized Estimator), which approximates the Fisher information using a uniformly random subset of model parameters. Empirically, FLARE improves uncertainty estimation in synthetic time-series generation tasks, achieving more accurate and reliable filtering than other methods. Theoretically, we bound the convergence rate of our randomized approximation and provide analytic and empirical evidence that last-layer Laplace approximations are insufficient for this task.
Hutch++: Optimal Stochastic Trace EstimationRaphael A. Meyer, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco et al.
We study the problem of estimating the trace of a matrix $A$ that can only be accessed through matrix-vector multiplication. We introduce a new randomized algorithm, Hutch++, which computes a $(1 \pm ε)$ approximation to $tr(A)$ for any positive semidefinite (PSD) $A$ using just $O(1/ε)$ matrix-vector products. This improves on the ubiquitous Hutchinson's estimator, which requires $O(1/ε^2)$ matrix-vector products. Our approach is based on a simple technique for reducing the variance of Hutchinson's estimator using a low-rank approximation step, and is easy to implement and analyze. Moreover, we prove that, up to a logarithmic factor, the complexity of Hutch++ is optimal amongst all matrix-vector query algorithms, even when queries can be chosen adaptively. We show that it significantly outperforms Hutchinson's method in experiments. While our theory mainly requires $A$ to be positive semidefinite, we provide generalized guarantees for general square matrices, and show empirical gains in such applications.
3.3LGJun 14, 2020
The Statistical Cost of Robust Kernel Hyperparameter TuningRaphael A. Meyer, Christopher Musco
This paper studies the statistical complexity of kernel hyperparameter tuning in the setting of active regression under adversarial noise. We consider the problem of finding the best interpolant from a class of kernels with unknown hyperparameters, assuming only that the noise is square-integrable. We provide finite-sample guarantees for the problem, characterizing how increasing the complexity of the kernel class increases the complexity of learning kernel hyperparameters. For common kernel classes (e.g. squared-exponential kernels with unknown lengthscale), our results show that hyperparameter optimization increases sample complexity by just a logarithmic factor, in comparison to the setting where optimal parameters are known in advance. Our result is based on a subsampling guarantee for linear regression under multiple design matrices, combined with an ε-net argument for discretizing kernel parameterizations.
1.0LGJan 25, 2019
Optimality Implies Kernel Sum Classifiers are Statistically EfficientRaphael Arkady Meyer, Jean Honorio
We propose a novel combination of optimization tools with learning theory bounds in order to analyze the sample complexity of optimal kernel sum classifiers. This contrasts the typical learning theoretic results which hold for all (potentially suboptimal) classifiers. Our work also justifies assumptions made in prior work on multiple kernel learning. As a byproduct of our analysis, we also provide a new form of Rademacher complexity for hypothesis classes containing only optimal classifiers.