R. Srikant

Saptarshi Mandal, Seo Taek Kong, Dimitrios Katselis et al.

The Dawid-Skene model is the most widely assumed model in the analysis of crowdsourcing algorithms that estimate ground-truth labels from noisy worker responses. In this work, we are motivated by crowdsourcing applications where workers have distinct skill sets and their accuracy additionally depends on a task's type. While weighted majority vote (WMV) with a single weight vector for each worker achieves the optimal label estimation error in the Dawid-Skene model, we show that different weights for different types are necessary for a multi-type model. Focusing on the case where there are two types of tasks, we propose a spectral method to partition tasks into two groups that cluster tasks by type. Our analysis reveals that task types can be perfectly recovered if the number of workers $n$ scales logarithmically with the number of tasks $d$. Any algorithm designed for the Dawid-Skene model can then be applied independently to each type to infer the labels. Numerical experiments show how clustering tasks by type before estimating ground-truth labels enhances the performance of crowdsourcing algorithms in practical applications.

Saptarshi Mandal, Xiaojun Lin, R. Srikant

Knowledge distillation, where a small student model learns from a pre-trained large teacher model, has achieved substantial empirical success since the seminal work of \citep{hinton2015distilling}. Despite prior theoretical studies exploring the benefits of knowledge distillation, an important question remains unanswered: why does soft-label training from the teacher require significantly fewer neurons than directly training a small neural network with hard labels? To address this, we first present motivating experimental results using simple neural network models on a binary classification problem. These results demonstrate that soft-label training consistently outperforms hard-label training in accuracy, with the performance gap becoming more pronounced as the dataset becomes increasingly difficult to classify. We then substantiate these observations with a theoretical contribution based on two-layer neural network models. Specifically, we show that soft-label training using gradient descent requires only $O\left(\frac{1}{γ^2 ε}\right)$ neurons to achieve a classification loss averaged over epochs smaller than some $ε> 0$, where $γ$ is the separation margin of the limiting kernel. In contrast, hard-label training requires $O\left(\frac{1}{γ^4} \cdot \ln\left(\frac{1}ε\right)\right)$ neurons, as derived from an adapted version of the gradient descent analysis in \citep{ji2020polylogarithmic}. This implies that when $γ\leq ε$, i.e., when the dataset is challenging to classify, the neuron requirement for soft-label training can be significantly lower than that for hard-label training. Finally, we present experimental results on deep neural networks, further validating these theoretical findings.