3.7ROJul 16
Environment Design for Reliable Shared Autonomy with Probabilistic GuaranteesYi-Shiuan Tung, Himanshu Gupta, Gyanig Kumar et al.
Shared autonomy enables humans and robots to collaboratively perform tasks by combining human input with autonomous assistance. Most prior work focuses on improving intent inference under a fixed environment, overlooking how workspace design itself affects inference difficulty. We observe that the physical arrangement of objects directly influences the separability of candidate goals under noisy user inputs. We formulate workspace design as an optimization problem and derive a probabilistic correctness guarantee under a bounded noise model. Through simulation experiments across multiple tabletop scenarios, we show that optimized layouts improve goal inference reliability and reduce ambiguity compared to baseline arrangements. We further demonstrate a real-world shared autonomy system that integrates the proposed inference framework. This highlights the role of environment design as a complementary axis for improving shared autonomy systems.
2.7ROJul 16
Risk-Aware Preference Learning for Stochastic OutcomesYi-Shiuan Tung, Yuni Wu, Wei Jiang et al.
Learning reward functions from human preferences is a widely used approach for aligning robot behavior with user expectations in human-robot interaction. Most existing approaches assume that humans evaluate uncertain outcomes using expected utility (EU), aggregating outcome utilities linearly with their probabilities. However, behavioral evidence shows that humans are systematically risk-sensitive, overweighting rare negative events and exhibiting loss aversion. We study the consequences of this mismatch in social robot navigation, where safety-critical outcomes (e.g., collisions) are rare but highly consequential. We compare EU with Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT), a nonlinear model of human decision-making, within a Bradley-Terry preference learning framework. Our preliminary experiments show that when preferences are generated by risk-sensitive users, CPT-based learners recover reward functions with substantially lower regret compared to EU-based learners. Our results highlight the importance of modeling human risk sensitivity when learning rewards from preferences over stochastic robot outcomes.