Jiawei Li

Wen Yang Tan, Jiawei Li, Fang Liu et al.

Battery health estimation is fundamental for battery management in battery-powered systems, where inaccurate health states may affect control, maintenance, and service life. It becomes even more critical in intelligent connected systems, where estimation errors can propagate across interconnected devices and downstream decisions. In this paper, we propose TIDE, a trustworthy and interpretable battery degradation estimator for reliable battery health estimation. TIDE jointly considers accuracy, trustworthiness, and interpretability, which are all essential for practical deployment and downstream decision making. To realize these objectives, TIDE combines battery-domain knowledge with operational measurements in a three-component backbone. A knowledge-guided degradation prior promotes trustworthy estimation, a monotone residual component provides interpretable aging-consistent refinement, and a contextual learning component captures battery-specific operational effects for improved accuracy. The trained backbone is then distilled into a compact symbolic surrogate that provides a concise model-level interpretation of its learned estimation logic. Experiments show that TIDE achieves strong estimation accuracy, improving overall estimation fidelity by an average of 19.7% over representative baselines. Its knowledge-guided prior and monotone residual modelling substantially reduce aging-consistency violations, supporting trustworthy estimation. Meanwhile, the backbone enables component-level interpretation, while symbolic distillation provides a compact model-level representation of the learned estimation logic. These results support the practical use of TIDE for battery health monitoring and decision support in intelligent connected systems.

Chengyu Shen, Yujie Fu, Gangtao Xin et al.

Large language models are increasingly evolving from text generators into general agents capable of understanding user requests, invoking external tools, and completing complex tasks through interaction. However, existing agent benchmarks often focus on limited scenarios, tool ecosystems, or interaction formats, making it difficult to systematically characterize model capabilities across heterogeneous application settings. We introduce OmniaBench, a benchmark for evaluating general agents across diverse scenarios with explicit state spaces. We derive application-oriented scenario knowledge from app stores, product documents, industry resources, Web retrieval, and human refinement, forming a hierarchical taxonomy that spans ToC, ToB and ToE with 90 level-1 and 354 level-2 domains. Based on this taxonomy, we construct executable environments and synthesize single-turn and multi-turn tasks through four complementary routes: DAG, DAG-S, Solver, and Program. OmniaBench further introduces a ten-dimensional capability taxonomy and eight compositional atomic difficulty factors to support fine-grained evaluation and analysis. The resulting dataset contains 1,431 tasks, together with a challenging subset of 644 tasks designed to reduce evaluation cost and mitigate potential contamination of the full set after public release. The bench presents substantial challenges to current frontier models, with even Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Sol achieving Overall Pass@1 scores of only 58.54 and 57.14, respectively. Further analyses reveal clear differences across domains and capabilities, as well as persistent limitations in planning, constraint maintenance, and adaptive correction. OmniaBench provides a broad and diagnostic benchmark for characterizing the capability boundaries of general agents.