A Sharma

Tanay Sodha, Aditya Sharma, Ramya Hebbalaguppe et al.

Reliable confidence estimation remains a key limitation of test-time adaptation in vision-language models (VLMs), where prompt tuning improves zero-shot accuracy but often degrades calibration due to entropy-driven overconfidence. Prior approaches mitigate this using LLM-derived class attributes and contrastive regularization, yet treat attributes independently, ignoring their relational structure. We propose ARGTCA, which represents (class, attribute) pairs as nodes in a Symbolic Attribute Graph and trains a Graph Attention Network (GAT) using contrastive objectives to produce structurally informed embeddings that capture inter-attribute dependencies. We introduce two attribute selection strategies: ARGTCA-DIV for intra-class diversity and ARGTCA-DISC for inter-class discrimination. Experiments across nine benchmarks show that ARGTCA-DIV reduces average Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by approximately ~37% over baselines, while ARGTCA-DISC consistently performs as the second-best variant, reducing average ECE by approximately ~17% over baselines. These results suggest that modeling symbolic attribute interactions provides a principled approach for reliable test-time adaptation in VLMs.

Aristotelis Lazaridis, Aman Sharma, Dylan Bates et al.

Yes. Can it cure doom loops? Probably not. The Gemma 4 instruction-tuned models share a reproducible failure: on long factual enumeration prompts, such as listing every episode of a TV series, the 88 IAU constellations, or the 151 original Pokemon, they collapse into repetition, either a tight verbatim loop or a list whose entries decay onto a single answer. These loops occur at rates as high as 95% and survive prompt rewording, inference-engine changes, and most sampling adjustments. In this paper we explore whether this behavior is localized enough to remove by weight edits. To localize the cause, we use per-layer ablation and per-neuron attribution, then confirm the strongest candidates with full-generation sweeps. The loops trace to a small set of MLP neurons (or, in the 26B-A4B Mixture-of-Experts model, a few routed experts) which we suppress with static weight edits. These "surgeries" can be as small as a single sign-inverted neuron (in the E2B model). The size of the effective edits grows with model scale, but in all cases, the loop patterns can be addressed at normal generation budgets while preserving general-purpose benchmark scores. However, the edits do not solve everything: we also study longer thinking budgets, where the two larger models most visibly enter doom looping, i.e. a non-convergent regime in which the model self-corrects in circles over a fact it cannot recall, exhausting the budget without committing to a final answer. We show this residual failure is reduced but not eliminated by the same edits, and argue it is fundamentally a knowledge-precision problem rather than a removable circuit; weight surgery can delete a loop, but it cannot supply a missing fact. Our results are both a feasibility demonstration, that is, evidence that a concrete generation pathology can be localized to a few parameters and edited out, and a delineation of where that approach stops.

Arnav Sharma, Pratyush Jena, Amal Joseph et al.

Stone inscriptions are invaluable sources of historical and linguistic knowledge, yet their automated analysis remains a major challenge due to surface irregularities, erosion, and low visual contrast. Conventional document and handwriting analysis techniques fail to perform well in these scenarios. In this work, we propose character detection as a core strategy for robust inscription analysis. We introduce EpiSAM, a prompt-guided transformer framework for character segmentation in stone inscriptions. Rather than treating characters in isolation, EpiSAM employs a novel neighbor-aware strategy, explicitly predicting adjacent characters alongside the target. These contextual cues resolve boundary ambiguities, improving mask generation and enabling more accurate character segmentation. Furthermore, we expand an existing stone inscription dataset by adding dense polygonal annotations for characters, thereby enabling comprehensive research on Southeast Asian epigraphy. Experimental results show that EpiSAM achieves consistent improvements over existing baselines, while also exhibiting strong zero-shot generalization in challenging epigraphic scenarios.

Joyanta Jyoti Mondal, Ibne Farabi Shihab, Anuj Sharma

Contextual bandits with graph-structured arms arise in recommendation, citation retrieval, and social advertising, where arms connected on a graph tend to share reward signal. Standard dimensionality reduction ignores this structure, inflating exploration cost by a factor of $d/k$. We propose GraphDR-LinUCB, which projects arm features onto the graph's low-frequency spectral subspace and runs linear UCB in the resulting $k$-dimensional space. We prove the first $\wtO(k\sqrt{T})$ regret bound for spectral-projection-based contextual bandits, reducing dimension dependence from $d$ to $k$; a perturbation argument extends this to noisy graphs, with an explicit penalty for reward-smoothness mismatch and graph-estimation error. Our central theoretical finding is that the high-frequency reward component need not incur a worst-case linear-in-$T$ penalty: its actual cost depends on its realized impact along the played path, not on its total energy. A simple spectral comparison between subspaces ($Γ_k$) predicts which reducer wins on a given dataset, correctly calling five of six real-dataset outcomes without any fitted threshold. Across a synthetic benchmark and six real datasets (MovieLens, Amazon, LastFM, ogbn-arxiv, MIND), GraphDR-LinUCB reduces cumulative regret by $15\times$ over full-dimensional LinUCB and outperforms competing graph-aware methods on five of six; the single failure is precisely where the graph's spectral subspace is misaligned with the reward.

Ashutosh Sharma

Learned sparse retrieval models such as SPLADE achieve retrieval quality competitive with dense models while preserving the interpretability and exact-match advantages of sparse representations. However, inference-time scoring still relies on CPU-bound inverted index traversal algorithms (WAND, Block-Max WAND), creating a fundamental bottleneck for real-time serving at scale. We present GPUSparse, a system for GPU-accelerated exact learned sparse retrieval that introduces: (1) a GPU-parallel inverted index with block-aligned, warp-coalesced posting lists; (2) a batched scatter-add scoring algorithm that processes hundreds of queries simultaneously; and (3) fused Triton kernels with an analysis of the tradeoff between work-efficiency and hardware utilization. On MS MARCO passage ranking (8.8M passages) with real SPLADE embeddings, GPUSparse matches CPU exact scoring to three decimals (MRR@10=0.383, equal to Pyserini SPLADE at this precision; Recall@1000>=0.999 vs. dense matmul, the residual from floating-point tie-breaking) while providing a 235x speedup over Pyserini CPU at 8.8M documents (1.27ms vs. 298ms per query). Compared to Seismic (the fastest CPU sparse retrieval system), which trades 25% recall for speed (R@1000=0.738 vs. 0.983 exact), GPUSparse achieves exact scoring at 787 QPS throughput (batch 500) on the full 8.8M collection, with 1.3ms per query. Our document-parallel kernel reaches 62.6% of H100 peak HBM bandwidth, revealing a fundamental work-efficiency vs. bandwidth-efficiency tradeoff in GPU sparse retrieval. The reformulation of sparse scoring as scatter-add over an inverted index is shared with SPARe's iterative mode; our contribution is its fused-kernel realization, which we measure to be 23-270x faster than a faithful SPARe iterative reimplementation.

Ashutosh Sharma

Multi-vector retrieval models such as ColBERT achieve state-of-the-art accuracy through fine-grained token-level MaxSim scoring, yet existing GPU implementations leave most hardware performance unused. We give a roofline analysis of MaxSim on modern GPUs and identify a severe bandwidth gap: naive implementations reach only 5-18% of peak HBM bandwidth because they materialize the Nq x Nd similarity matrix, wasting memory traffic on data that is consumed once and discarded. We present TileMaxSim, a family of IO-aware Triton kernels that close this gap via (1) multi-query SRAM tiling that streams document embeddings through shared memory while accumulating per-query-token maxima in registers, reading each embedding from HBM exactly once; (2) dimension tiling that partitions the embedding dimension into 128-wide chunks, enabling scoring for d > 128 embeddings that overflow shared memory; and (3) fused product-quantization scoring via shared-memory lookup tables, cutting HBM I/O by up to ~31x. On NVIDIA H100 GPUs, TileMaxSim reaches 80.2% of peak HBM bandwidth and scores 82M documents/second (71.6M/s on real MS MARCO passages), a 220x speedup over loop-based scoring, 6.5x over fused PyTorch, 6.6-8.5x over torch.compile, and 469x the scoring throughput of WARP's CPU engine on the same node. TileMaxSim preserves exact retrieval quality: on MS MARCO and three BEIR benchmarks, rankings match reference MaxSim. As a drop-in replacement in ColBERTv2/PLAID, it cuts scoring latency at 100K candidates from 268 ms to 1.2 ms (98% lower end-to-end latency). We further show constant throughput from 100K to 500K documents, data-parallel multi-GPU sharding, robustness across dimensions 64-768, and FP16/BF16/FP32 support. Concurrent work independently develops an IO-aware fused MaxSim kernel; we differ in dimension tiling for d > 128 and fused product-quantization scoring.

Prajjwal Gupta, Prasang Gupta, Vishal Bhutani et al.

As agentic LLM systems move from prototypes to deployment across increasingly diverse domains, evaluating them has become both more important and more difficult. The challenge is not only that individual metrics may be unreliable, but that evaluation goals are often left implicit. Without a clear account of what a system is expected to do, how it can fail, and which failures matter, metric choices become difficult to justify, interpret, or validate. We present Litmus, a zero-label system that designs evaluation and monitoring metrics for AI pipelines by eliciting evaluation intent from source code and targeted interrogation. Instead of assuming that the evaluation target is already known, Litmus first identifies what must be measured and why, then converts those answers into constraints for constructing a justified, per-stage metric portfolio. We evaluate Litmus on three real, code-defined AI pipelines - financial account grouping, scientific QA, and inherent risk assessment - against AutoMetrics and three DynamicRubric baselines. Litmus achieves the broadest or tied-broadest concern coverage, spans more pipeline stages, produces a near-zero-redundancy portfolio, and ranks first in validity against per-row quality labels on all three pipelines - decisively on scientific QA (Spearman $ρ=0.72$ vs. less than $0.47$ for every baseline), and within overlapping confidence intervals in relation to two components of the audit framework despite using no labels during metric design. Our results support a shift from automatic metric implementation to automatic metric specification: before asking which metric to compute, evaluation systems should ask what must be measured and why.

Bryan Bo Cao, Abhinav Sharma, Lawrence O'Gorman et al.

While much effort has focused on developing and benchmarking high-performance neural networks, less attention has been given to how dataset properties, known to practitioners, can guide efficient model selection. Neural models are typically evaluated on datasets with thousands of classes, yet many real-world applications involve fewer than ten. To address this understudied but common setting, we develop a measure of classification difficulty based on data-side properties and show how it enables more efficient model selection for few-class datasets, where traditional approaches are less effective. We term this phenomenon "few-class distinctiveness". Our metric allows comparison of models and datasets 6 to 29$\times$ faster than repeated training and testing. Leveraging this insight, we extend scaled model families below the smallest published models, achieving greater efficiency at similar accuracy, for example models up to 42% smaller than YOLOv5-nano for a mobile robot task. Targeting resource-constrained applications, we demonstrate few-class model selection across mobile robot, drone, and IoT scenarios, highlighting practical gains in efficiency without sacrificing performance.

Anand Sharma, Chen Liu, Daniele Coslovich et al.

Interpreting machine-learning models has attracted increasing attention, particularly in the physical sciences, where one often seeks to understand the underlying mechanisms rather than merely make predictions. Multiple linear regression is often regarded as an interpretable alternative to more complex models, such as deep neural networks, because its predictions are expressed as explicit weighted sums of input features. However, when input features are strongly correlated, namely in the presence of multicollinearity, the learned weights can exhibit large dataset-to-dataset fluctuations and oscillatory behavior across physically similar features, making their interpretation difficult or even impossible. Although the instability of the weights under multicollinearity is well known in statistics, its consequences for physical interpretation, in particular its connection to oscillatory weights across physically similar features, have not been systematically clarified. Here, we theoretically discuss the mechanism behind this loss of interpretability by analyzing the eigenmodes of the feature correlation matrix. We show that small-eigenvalue modes associated with multicollinearity amplify fluctuations in the weights and generate oscillatory patterns that do not necessarily reflect meaningful contributions. We test this theoretical picture numerically on physics datasets and show that Ridge regularization suppresses these unstable modes, although the resulting weights must still be interpreted with caution. We further confirm the generality of our findings beyond physics by analyzing a diverse collection of publicly available datasets. Our results clarify why, in the presence of multicollinearity, physical interpretation can remain difficult even for linear regression models.