Andrea Stocco

Davide Jannussi, Stefano Carlo Lambertenghi, Constantin Carste et al.

Simulation-based testing enables safe and repeatable evaluation of autonomous driving systems, but its effectiveness is limited by the gap between synthetic simulator outputs and real-world camera observations. To address this problem, we present Cam2Sim, a tool that transforms real-world driving recordings into playable CARLA simulation scenarios. Starting from camera images and poses, Cam2Sim reconstructs road geometry, ego trajectories, parked vehicles, and simulation assets, and augments the reconstructed environment with Gaussian Splatting to render camera observations that resemble the original recording. The framework supports ROS-based data extraction, parked-vehicle detection, OpenStreetMap-based map generation, CARLA scenario construction, Gaussian Splatting training, trajectory replay, and closed-loop execution with a system under test. We validate Cam2Sim on a real-world urban-driving scenario with a camera-based end-to-end driving model, comparing reconstruction quality, image-generation quality, and closed-loop behavior against both a simulation-only baseline and the real-world target. Results show that Gaussian-Splatting-based rendering reduces the visual gap with respect to standard simulator rendering and improves behavioral similarity to the real-world reference runs. The artifact is publicly available at https: //github.com/ast-fortiss-tum/cam2sim, and a screencast showing the tool is available at https://youtu.be/KmZ74l1__lI

Manfredi Napolitano, Alessandra Somma, Alessio Gambi et al.

Autonomous driving research has largely focused on safety while giving limited attention to non-functional aspects such as energy consumption and sustainability. As Autonomous Electric Vehicles (AEVs) become increasingly common in urban traffic, understanding how complex traffic dynamics influence their energy consumption is paramount to test whether AEVs can complete trips before battery depletion. To support energy-aware scenario-based testing of AEVs, we present E-CoDrive, a framework for reproducible closed-loop driving co-simulations that integrates an energy consumption model, a micro-traffic simulator, and a high-fidelity driving simulator to test AEV software stacks in urban scenarios. This tool paper describes the architecture of E-CoDrive and demonstrates its applicability by testing an Autoware-based AEV stack. Our evaluation shows that varying traffic conditions produce substantial differences in vehicle energy consumption. The artifact is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32244783, and a screencast showing the tool is available at https://youtu.be/yX9fWHqCvgc.

Stefano Carlo Lambertenghi, Matthias Weil, Andrea Stocco

Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) must operate reliably under diverse conditions, yet representative data for rare or adverse scenarios is difficult to obtain. Perturbation-based testing is widely used to assess robustness, but most studies focus on offline datasets or simulation, leaving open questions about how such results translate to real-world driving. We present a large-scale study of 72 camera and LiDAR perturbations, evaluated across three testing modalities: offline model-level analysis, hardware-in-the-loop execution, and closed-loop system-level testing on a full-scale autonomous vehicle. The study covers both an end-to-end vision-based driving model and a modular LiDAR-based perception and planning stack. Our results reveal a clear gap between testing levels. For camera-based systems, perturbations with limited offline impact can still induce unstable control and failures in real-world driving. For LiDAR-based systems, degradation is more consistent at the perception level but weakly predictive of system-level failures. Across both modalities, model-level metrics alone are insufficient to identify the most harmful perturbations. We further show that real-time feasibility is a key constraint in real-world testing, and that robustness observations obtained from recorded data do not consistently transfer to closed-loop behavior on a physical vehicle, highlighting the importance of complementary real-world, system-level evaluation.