I Foster

Hai Duc Nguyen, Tekin Bicer, Kyle Chard et al.

Adding reliable checkpoint/restart support to an MPI scientific application is a time-consuming expert effort that requires deep knowledge of both the application and resilience. We ask whether a frontier large language model can perform this work end-to-end without human intervention. We assemble a benchmark suite of MPI applications spanning diverse domains and computation patterns, and drive an iterative code-generation loop for each application using Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 invoked through the OpenCode CLI. Across six scientific applications, the LLM generates working checkpoint/restart code in 50 minutes on average while consuming 3.4 M tokens per application. The generated code adds negligible overhead during normal failure-free execution on five of six applications and recovers from injected process failures with efficiency comparable to human-engineered checkpoint/restart implementations. These results suggest that automated end-to-end LLM-driven resilience engineering is technically viable today for a meaningful fraction of HPC applications.

Hai Duc Nguyen, Bogdan Nicolae, Tekin Bicer et al.

Real-time scientific workflows operate on continuous data streams and must produce timely, high-quality results despite executing on complex, failure-prone infrastructure. Hardware faults, network disruptions, and performance anomalies caused by resource contention or system heterogeneity can severely degrade performance and violate real-time constraints. We focus on strengthening the resilience of the producer-consumer streaming pattern, a fundamental building block of scientific streaming workflows. We present two complementary techniques: (i) a dynamic, asynchronous, non-blocking checkpointing mechanism that preserves progress without interrupting computation, and (ii) a progress-aware load redistribution strategy that detects slow workers and proactively rebalances tasks. Together, these mechanisms maintain forward progress and balanced execution even in highly error-prone environments. Experimental results show that our approach reduces the impact of failures and performance anomalies by up to 6x, while introducing less than 1% overhead in failure-free execution.