Sander Stuijk

Rick Luiken, Manil Dev Gomony, Sander Stuijk

Convolutional Spiking Neural Networks (SNN) offer the potential for highly energy-efficient vision processing by exploiting sparse, event-driven computation. However, existing SNN accelerators underutilize the inherent parallelism of convolutional layers and lack the flexibility to accommodate varying memory demands and input sparsity across layers. This paper presents Mega, a digital architecture for convolutional SNNs that addresses these limitations through three key contributions: (1) highly parallel acceleration of $3 \times 3$ convolutions, (2) a unified data memory for spikes, neuron states, and weights, and (3) efficient spike map processing with low-overhead spike detection. Fabricated in GlobalFoundries 22 nm FDSOI technology, Mega achieves an energy efficiency of 0.375 pJ/SOP, improving the state of the art by $4\times$.

Jiaqi Wu, Bai Li, Jochen Hartmann et al.

A minute lexical variation can reverse the procedural meaning of an instruction even when the rest of the sentence remains unchanged. In automotive maintenance instructions, this pattern often appears when an action phrase turns an instruction into its procedural counterpart. The entities, modifiers, and surrounding context remain largely invariant, while the action phrase determines the procedural relation. We define this task as Complementary Action Modeling (CAM). Given a maintenance instruction, the goal is to identify or generate its procedural counterpart by modifying the action phrase while preserving the remaining sentence context. This task focuses on three aspects: distinguishing complementarity from surface similarity, controlling generation at the action-phrase level, and evaluating relational correctness using retrieval, overlap-based, and human evaluation. Using a German automotive maintenance dataset, we examine these questions through candidate matching and controlled Seq2Seq generation. The results show that complementary maintenance instructions are best modeled as procedural associations grounded in subtle lexical cues. They should therefore not be treated as ordinary cases of sentence similarity or synonym-based paraphrasing.