Cho-Jui Hsieh

Anshul Nasery, Ramnath Kumar, Cho-Jui Hsieh et al.

The proliferation of AI-powered image editing systems raises serious concerns because it allows personal images to be arbitrarily manipulated at scale, with minimal effort, and a lower barrier to entry. Prior work on image immunization adds imperceptible perturbations to an image to protect against unauthorized manipulations. However, these methods usually require access to the model weights and the image manipulating prompt. This significantly limits their use, especially against powerful commercial image-editors such as GPT-Image, Gemini Flash Image (Nano Banana), and Grok Imagine. To address this, we take a system-level view of the problem and identify a previously unexplored attack surface common to all major commercial image editing systems: pre-generation safety moderation.Rather than disrupting the generative model itself, we propose to immunize images by causing these moderation classifiers to flag images as policy-violating, triggering an automatic refusal regardless of the editing prompt. We operationalize this by adding adversarial perturbations to align our image to policy-violating concepts in the representation space of an ensemble of open-source embedding and moderation models. We call our method MIRAGE, which stands for Moderation Induced Resistance Against Generative Editing. We evaluate MIRAGE against multiple closed-source image editing APIs and demonstrate success rates of more than 88%. Our approach is simple, prompt-agnostic, and effective, offering a practical path towards protecting personal images from unauthorized AI-powered editing.

Aaron J. Li, Hao Huang, Youngmin Park et al.

Current LLM evaluation relies on two complementary but often disconnected signals: static benchmarks with objective correctness labels and arena-style preference data that better reflect open-ended user interactions. We introduce DualEval, a latent model-item calibration framework that represents models and evaluation items in a shared space, jointly estimating model ability together with item difficulty and sharpness. We apply DualEval across four domains: coding, math, miscellaneous domain-knowledge tasks, and generic everyday user queries. Our evaluation uses 18 frontier LLMs, static benchmark labels, and reward-model scores validated against held-out human preferences for open-ended model responses. Empirically, our framework produces reliable and balanced model rankings, and its learned item-level profiles support downstream applications such as benchmark compression for sample-efficient evaluation and anomaly detection for contamination or outlier analysis. Overall, DualEval unifies static and arena-style evaluation through joint model-item calibration, producing model rankings and item-level diagnostics that support more sample-efficient, interpretable, and auditable evaluation pipelines.