Haoran Guo

Haoran Guo, Haoyang Wang, Zhengxiong Li et al.

Tactile sensing is critical for learning-based dexterous manipulation, yet principled guidelines for sensor placement remain largely absent. While dense sensor arrays provide rich contact feedback, they impose significant hardware costs and can even degrade policy performance by introducing redundant or conflicting inputs. This paper presents the first systematic framework for quantifying the contribution of individual tactile sensors to deep reinforcement learning (DRL) policy performance. We propose a two-stage approach: a coarse empirical pruning phase that reduces the sensor count on the Shadow Hand from 92 to 21 while retaining 93\% task performance, followed by a fine-grained active learning phase that combines Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with Lasso regression to rank the functional importance of each remaining sensor. Our analysis reveals that sensors on the thumb, ring finger, and little finger dominate manipulation performance, while middle-finger sensors exhibit negative contributions -- actively degrading policy learning. Ablation studies across three manipulation tasks (block, egg, and pen) confirm that a 14-sensor configuration preserves over 90\% of the full-array performance. Zero-shot transfer experiments on two novel objects and cross-platform validation on the Allegro and Leap Hand further demonstrate that the identified importance rankings generalize across tasks and robot morphologies. These findings establish quantitative deployment guidelines that enable practitioners to select cost-effective sensor configurations with predictable performance trade-offs.

Chengyu Du, Jinyi Han, Yizhou Ying et al.

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated that progressive refinement, rather than providing a single answer, results in more accurate and thoughtful outputs. However, existing methods often rely heavily on supervision signals to evaluate previous responses, making it difficult to assess output quality in more open-ended scenarios effectively. Additionally, these methods are typically designed for specific tasks, which limits their generalization to new domains. To address these limitations, we propose Progressive Thought Refinement (PTR), a framework that enables LLMs to refine their responses progressively. PTR operates in two phases: (1) Thought data construction stage: We propose a weak and strong model collaborative selection strategy to build a high-quality progressive refinement dataset to ensure logical consistency from thought to answers, and the answers are gradually refined in each round. (2) Thought-Mask Fine-Tuning Phase: We design a training structure to mask the "thought" and adjust loss weights to encourage LLMs to refine prior thought, teaching them to implicitly understand "how to improve" rather than "what is correct." Experimental results show that PTR significantly enhances LLM performance across ten diverse tasks (avg. from 49.6% to 53.5%) without task-specific fine-tuning. Notably, in more open-ended tasks, LLMs also demonstrate substantial improvements in the quality of responses beyond mere accuracy, suggesting that PTR truly teaches LLMs to self-improve over time.

Zhouhong Gu, Xiaoxuan Zhu, Haoran Guo et al.

Language significantly influences the formation and evolution of Human emergent behavior, which is crucial in understanding collective intelligence within human societies. Considering that the study of how language affects human behavior needs to put it into the dynamic scenarios in which it is used, we introduce AgentGroupChat in this paper, a simulation that delves into the complex role of language in shaping collective behavior through interactive debate scenarios. Central to this simulation are characters engaging in dynamic conversation interactions. To enable simulation, we introduce the Verbal Strategist Agent, utilizing large language models to enhance interaction strategies by incorporating elements of persona and action. We set four narrative scenarios based on AgentGroupChat to demonstrate the simulation's capacity to mimic complex language use in group dynamics. Evaluations focus on aligning agent behaviors with human expectations and the emergence of collective behaviors within the simulation. Results reveal that emergent behaviors materialize from a confluence of factors: a conducive environment for extensive information exchange, characters with diverse traits, high linguistic comprehension, and strategic adaptability. During discussions on ``the impact of AI on humanity'' in AgentGroupChat simulation, philosophers commonly agreed that ``AI could enhance societal welfare with judicious limitations'' and even come to a conclusion that ``the essence of true intelligence encompasses understanding the necessity to constrain self abilities''. Additionally, in the competitive domain of casting for primary roles in films in AgentGroupChat, certain actors were ready to reduce their remuneration or accept lesser roles, motivated by their deep-seated desire to contribute to the project.