Ying Chen

Yikuang Yuluo, Ao Wang, Shen Kuan et al.

Sparse-view computed tomography is a severely ill-posed inverse problem, where recent 3D Gaussian Splatting methods offer an efficient explicit representation for tomographic reconstruction. However, we find that projection-domain optimization can be misleading in this setting: the rendered projections may continue to improve while the reconstructed volume deteriorates. We identify this failure mode as Projection-Volume Fidelity Divergence (PVFD), a representation-level optimization drift caused by anisotropic Gaussian deformation and view-specific primitive co-adaptation under sparse Radon constraints. To characterize this behavior, we introduce geometry- and volume-level diagnostics that measure needle-like Gaussian degeneration and the stability of the voxelized density field. Based on these observations, we propose LADES, a ground-truth-free optimization controller for sparse-view Gaussian tomography. LADES combines Linearly Annealed Dropout, which applies strong stochastic masking in early training to disrupt premature primitive co-adaptation and gradually restores full capacity for structural consolidation, with Structure-Aware Early Stopping, which terminates densification according to the saturation of Gaussian population growth rather than validation PSNR. Experiments on sparse-view CT reconstruction show that LADES improves volumetric fidelity, suppresses structural degeneration, and substantially reduces training time while maintaining competitive projection accuracy. These results suggest that robust Gaussian-based tomography requires monitoring and controlling volumetric structure, rather than optimizing projection fit alone.

Yuxiang Lin, Ying Chen

Virtual-cell and perturbation models are increasingly used to predict cellular responses for biomedical discovery, but chemical and genetic perturbations are not automatically interchangeable. Existing evaluations often study chemical response prediction or genetic perturbation prediction separately, leaving target-matched chemical-to-genetic translation under-tested. We introduce Chem2Gen-Bench, a benchmark comprising 260,084 chemical and 1,099,045 genetic perturbation profiles organized into cell-target contexts, and evaluate pairwise alignment, retrieval, protocol covariate associations, feature spaces, and foundation-model embeddings. Across matched contexts, translation fidelity is measurable but heterogeneous; background adjustment increases the association between pairwise similarity and retrieval success, while paired tests show lower mean retrieval success after adjustment under the evaluated settings. In a target-matched K562 audit, the evaluated foundation-model embeddings did not consistently improve over gene-delta baselines. Chem2Gen-Bench provides an auditable framework for testing when chemical and genetic perturbations align around shared targets and when representation gains are supported by matched perturbation evidence.