V. Stamatescu

CV
h-index27
4papers
975citations
Novelty24%
AI Score20

4 Papers

5.8CVOct 8, 2018
Diagnosing Convolutional Neural Networks using their Spectral Response

Victor Stamatescu, Mark D. McDonnell

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a class of artificial neural networks whose computational blocks use convolution, together with other linear and non-linear operations, to perform classification or regression. This paper explores the spectral response of CNNs and its potential use in diagnosing problems with their training. We measure the gain of CNNs trained for image classification on ImageNet and observe that the best models are also the most sensitive to perturbations of their input. Further, we perform experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 to find that the gain rises as the network learns and then saturates as the network converges. Moreover, we find that strong gain fluctuations can point to overfitting and learning problems caused by a poor choice of learning rate. We argue that the gain of CNNs can act as a diagnostic tool and potential replacement for the validation loss when hold-out validation data are not available.

0.9CVSep 12, 2017
Automatic Ground Truths: Projected Image Annotations for Omnidirectional Vision

Victor Stamatescu, Peter Barsznica, Manjung Kim et al.

We present a novel data set made up of omnidirectional video of multiple objects whose centroid positions are annotated automatically. Omnidirectional vision is an active field of research focused on the use of spherical imagery in video analysis and scene understanding, involving tasks such as object detection, tracking and recognition. Our goal is to provide a large and consistently annotated video data set that can be used to train and evaluate new algorithms for these tasks. Here we describe the experimental setup and software environment used to capture and map the 3D ground truth positions of multiple objects into the image. Furthermore, we estimate the expected systematic error on the mapped positions. In addition to final data products, we release publicly the software tools and raw data necessary to re-calibrate the camera and/or redo this mapping. The software also provides a simple framework for comparing the results of standard image annotation tools or visual tracking systems against our mapped ground truth annotations.

0.9CVApr 21, 2017
A data set for evaluating the performance of multi-class multi-object video tracking

Avishek Chakraborty, Victor Stamatescu, Sebastien C. Wong et al.

One of the challenges in evaluating multi-object video detection, tracking and classification systems is having publically available data sets with which to compare different systems. However, the measures of performance for tracking and classification are different. Data sets that are suitable for evaluating tracking systems may not be appropriate for classification. Tracking video data sets typically only have ground truth track IDs, while classification video data sets only have ground truth class-label IDs. The former identifies the same object over multiple frames, while the latter identifies the type of object in individual frames. This paper describes an advancement of the ground truth meta-data for the DARPA Neovision2 Tower data set to allow both the evaluation of tracking and classification. The ground truth data sets presented in this paper contain unique object IDs across 5 different classes of object (Car, Bus, Truck, Person, Cyclist) for 24 videos of 871 image frames each. In addition to the object IDs and class labels, the ground truth data also contains the original bounding box coordinates together with new bounding boxes in instances where un-annotated objects were present. The unique IDs are maintained during occlusions between multiple objects or when objects re-enter the field of view. This will provide: a solid foundation for evaluating the performance of multi-object tracking of different types of objects, a straightforward comparison of tracking system performance using the standard Multi Object Tracking (MOT) framework, and classification performance using the Neovision2 metrics. These data have been hosted publically.

30.6CVSep 28, 2016
Understanding data augmentation for classification: when to warp?

Sebastien C. Wong, Adam Gatt, Victor Stamatescu et al.

In this paper we investigate the benefit of augmenting data with synthetically created samples when training a machine learning classifier. Two approaches for creating additional training samples are data warping, which generates additional samples through transformations applied in the data-space, and synthetic over-sampling, which creates additional samples in feature-space. We experimentally evaluate the benefits of data augmentation for a convolutional backpropagation-trained neural network, a convolutional support vector machine and a convolutional extreme learning machine classifier, using the standard MNIST handwritten digit dataset. We found that while it is possible to perform generic augmentation in feature-space, if plausible transforms for the data are known then augmentation in data-space provides a greater benefit for improving performance and reducing overfitting.