Chengxi Deng

4papers

4 Papers

9.2SDJun 10
Towards Data-free and Training-free Compression for Speech Foundation Models Using Parameter Clustering

Haoning Xu, Zhaoqing Li, Huimeng Wang et al.

This paper presents a novel data-free and training-free compression approach for speech foundation models using channelwise clustering via k-means. More fine-grained, mixed sparsity pruning by layer-level varying number of parameter clusters is also explored. Experiments conducted on the LibriSpeech dataset suggest that when operating with pruning sparsity of 50% on HuBERT-large, consistent WER reductions of 27.73%/18.61% absolute (34.37%/21.91% relative) over the magnitude-based pruning were obtained on the test-clean and test-other subsets before fine-tuning and 0.19%/0.79% absolute (3.36%/4.62% relative) after fine-tuning with only 3 epochs. Similar WER reductions of 2.86%/5.02% absolute (59.21%/55.29% relative) were observed against magnitudebased pruning on Whisper-large-v3 at 10% sparsity, all with no significant WER increase relative to the uncompressed baseline.

9.7ASJun 15
Confidence Score Guided Incremental and Speaker Adaptive Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Elderly Speech Recognition

Chengxi Deng, Xurong Xie, Shujie Hu et al.

This paper proposes a novel confidence score guided incremental and speaker adaptive pseudo-labeling approach for semi-supervised elderly speech recognition. It facilitates higher-quality pseudo-label selection and progressive refinement, while also mitigating speaker heterogeneity. A confidence estimation module is designed to rank the reliability of untranscribed data, enabling a curriculum learning trajectory that progressively folds in unlabeled data subsets from high to low confidence. Speaker-specific characteristics are captured through speaker adaptive training with learnable prompts. Experiments on the English DementiaBank Pitt and Cantonese JCCOCC MoCA elderly speech datasets suggest that the proposed method outperforms the semi-supervised baseline using no confidence scores guided incremental or speaker adaptive pseudo-labeling by statistically significant word error rate (WER) or character error rate (CER) reductions of 1.45% and 2.27% absolute (6.21% and 6.98% relative).

10.1ASJun 15
Decoding while Adapting: Zero-Shot Online Speaker Adaptation via Audio-Textual Prompts for Elderly Speech Recognition

Chengxi Deng, Xurong Xie, Shujie Hu et al.

This paper proposes a novel cross-utterance audio-textual prompts based speaker adaptation approach for elderly speech recognition. It enables zero-shot, real-time adaptation to unseen speakers. Speech and text embeddings are extracted from the current and a few preceding utterances, before being fused in a cross-modal manner to produce compact speaker prompts that are more consistent than i/x-vectors and ECAPA-TDNN features. Experiments on the English DementiaBank Pitt and Cantonese JCCOCC MoCA elderly speech datasets suggest that the proposed online adaptation outperforms the speaker-independent (SI) model by statistically significant word error rate (WER) or character error rate (CER) reductions of 0.61% and 1.22% absolute (2.99% and 4.48% relative). Real-time factor (RTF) speed-up ratios of up to 9.83 times are obtained over offline batch-mode adaptation.

8.1SDJun 12
Explainable and Trustworthy Speech Emotion Recognition Using Confidence Score and Reinforcement Learning Rectified Speech Emotion Descriptors

Youjun Chen, Xurong Xie, Mengzhe Geng et al.

Explainable and trustworthy speech emotion recognition (SER) remains a challenging task to date, largely due to the scarcity of SER data with reliable speech emotion descriptor (SED) labels, such as prosodic features and speaker traits. This paper presents a confidence score and reinforcement learning (RL) based on-the-fly SED rectification approach for post-training SER systems on automatically annotated SED labels. Experiments on IEMOCAP and MELD suggest that explainable SER systems incorporating the proposed confidence score and RL-based SED rectification approach consistently outperform baselines without data selection or SED rectification. The best performing system, which integrates both components, surpasses the baseline without data selection and SED rectification, achieving SER gains of 2.9% and 3.3% absolute (3.7% and 5.4% relative) on IEMOCAP and MELD benchmarks, respectively.