Xi Wang

Zenan Wu, Bingqing Wei, Lu Liu et al.

Generalist manipulation policies are increasingly presented as foundation models for robotic control, but their real-world generalization remains difficult to diagnose. A policy may succeed on demonstrated tasks while still failing to execute fine-grained atomic skills or recombine learned skills in new task structures. We introduce \textbf{ATOM-Bench}, a real-world benchmark for evaluating both atomic skills and compositional generalization in manipulation policies. ATOM-Bench factorizes tabletop manipulation into motor atoms and instruction atoms, and contains 30 atomic tasks and 24 held-out compositional tasks across paired single-arm and dual-arm robot tracks. We collect 3,000 human demonstrations for atomic fine-tuning and release both the demonstration data and evaluation rollout data to support reproducible real-world evaluation. Policies are fine-tuned on atomic tasks and evaluated on both atomic skill acquisition and held-out compositional tasks. We further introduce Atomic Score (AS) and Compositional Failure Share (CFS) to distinguish failures caused by weak atomic skills from failures caused by limited compositional reuse. Through 2,700 physical rollouts on five representative manipulation policies, we find that current policies can acquire simple instruction-grounding skills, but still struggle with fine-grained motor atoms, counting, and logical filtering. More importantly, strong atomic performance does not reliably transfer to held-out compositional tasks. ATOM-Bench provides a diagnostic testbed for studying whether failures arise from weak motor execution, poor instruction grounding, or limited compositional reuse.

Yanyi Chen, Xi Wang, Min Deng

Physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) in real-world settings exposes operators to fluctuating environmental conditions during contact-rich tasks. Traditional task-centric evaluations overlook the physiological burdens imposed by these stressors. Therefore, we conducted a multimodal empirical study involving contact-rich tracing tasks under 18 distinct combinations of temperature, acoustic noise, and illuminance. Synchronously, we recorded electrodermal activity (EDA), surface electromyography (sEMG), eye-tracking data, and subjective environmental comfort ratings. Evaluating these physiological signals alongside execution data revealed hidden physiological costs not captured by objective performance. The results revealed that task performance remained stable across all environmental conditions. Autonomic workload, indexed by tonic skin conductance level (SCL), increased with temperature, while physical and cognitive workload were unaffected. Perceived environmental comfort showed no significant association with tracing error or completion time. These findings reveal a compensatory mechanism where operators maintain consistent performance by increasing their physiological effort to suppress thermal discomfort. Such insight motivates the development of physiology-aware control architectures that leverage real-time physiological metrics to reduce operator workload in unstructured environments.