CLFeb 12, 2025Code
Ask in Any Modality: A Comprehensive Survey on Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented GenerationMohammad Mahdi Abootorabi, Amirhosein Zobeiri, Mahdi Dehghani et al.
Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations and outdated knowledge due to their reliance on static training data. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these issues by integrating external dynamic information for improved factual grounding. With advances in multimodal learning, Multimodal RAG extends this approach by incorporating multiple modalities such as text, images, audio, and video to enhance the generated outputs. However, cross-modal alignment and reasoning introduce unique challenges beyond those in unimodal RAG. This survey offers a structured and comprehensive analysis of Multimodal RAG systems, covering datasets, benchmarks, metrics, evaluation, methodologies, and innovations in retrieval, fusion, augmentation, and generation. We review training strategies, robustness enhancements, loss functions, and agent-based approaches, while also exploring the diverse Multimodal RAG scenarios. In addition, we outline open challenges and future directions to guide research in this evolving field. This survey lays the foundation for developing more capable and reliable AI systems that effectively leverage multimodal dynamic external knowledge bases. All resources are publicly available at https://github.com/llm-lab-org/Multimodal-RAG-Survey.
25.4HCMar 29
Feeds Don't Tell the Whole Story: Measuring Online-Offline Emotion AlignmentSina Elahimanesh, Mohammadali Mohammadkhani, Shohreh Kasaei
In contemporary society, social media is deeply integrated into daily life, yet emotional expression often differs between real and online contexts. We studied the Persian community on X to explore this gap, designing a human-centered pipeline to measure alignment between real-world and social media emotions. Recent tweets and images of participants were collected and analyzed using Transformers-based text and image sentiment modules. Friends of participants provided insights into their real-world emotions, which were compared with online expressions using a distance criterion. The study involved N=105 participants, 393 friends, over 8,300 tweets, and 2,000 media images. Results showed only 28% similarity between images and real-world emotions, while tweets aligned about 76% with participants' real-life feelings. Statistical analyses confirmed significant disparities in sentiment proportions across images, tweets, and friends' perceptions, highlighting differences in emotional expression between online and offline environments and demonstrating practical utility of the proposed pipeline for understanding digital self-presentation.
89.9HCApr 5
Structure Matters: Evaluating Multi-Agents Orchestration in Generative Therapeutic ChatbotsSina Elahimanesh, Mohammadali Mohammadkhani, Sara Zahedi Movahed et al.
While large language models (LLMs) excel at open-ended dialogue, effective psychotherapy requires structured progression and adherence to clinical protocols, making the design of psychotherapist chatbots challenging. We investigate how different LLM-based designs shape perceived therapeutic dialogue in a chatbot grounded in the Self-Attachment Technique (SAT), a novel self-administered psychotherapy rooted in attachment theory. We compare three architectural variants: (1) a multi-agent system utilizing finite state machine aligned with therapeutic stages and a shared long-term memory, (2) a single-agent using identical knowledge-base and the same prompts, and (3) an unguided LLM. In an eight-day randomized controlled trial (RCT) with N=66 Farsi-speaking participants, balanced across the three chatbots, the multi-agent system is perceived as significantly more natural and human-like than the other variants and achieves higher ratings across most other metrics. These findings demonstrate that for therapeutic AI, architectural orchestration is as critical as prompt engineering in fostering natural, engaging dialogue.
CLDec 24, 2025
MultiMind at SemEval-2025 Task 7: Crosslingual Fact-Checked Claim Retrieval via Multi-Source AlignmentMohammad Mahdi Abootorabi, Alireza Ghahramani Kure, Mohammadali Mohammadkhani et al.
This paper presents our system for SemEval-2025 Task 7: Multilingual and Crosslingual Fact-Checked Claim Retrieval. In an era where misinformation spreads rapidly, effective fact-checking is increasingly critical. We introduce TriAligner, a novel approach that leverages a dual-encoder architecture with contrastive learning and incorporates both native and English translations across different modalities. Our method effectively retrieves claims across multiple languages by learning the relative importance of different sources in alignment. To enhance robustness, we employ efficient data preprocessing and augmentation using large language models while incorporating hard negative sampling to improve representation learning. We evaluate our approach on monolingual and crosslingual benchmarks, demonstrating significant improvements in retrieval accuracy and fact-checking performance over baselines.
HCApr 14, 2025
Emotion Alignment: Discovering the Gap Between Social Media and Real-World Sentiments in Persian Tweets and ImagesSina Elahimanesh, Mohammadali Mohammadkhani, Shohreh Kasaei
In contemporary society, widespread social media usage is evident in people's daily lives. Nevertheless, disparities in emotional expressions between the real world and online platforms can manifest. We comprehensively analyzed Persian community on X to explore this phenomenon. An innovative pipeline was designed to measure the similarity between emotions in the real world compared to social media. Accordingly, recent tweets and images of participants were gathered and analyzed using Transformers-based text and image sentiment analysis modules. Each participant's friends also provided insights into the their real-world emotions. A distance criterion was used to compare real-world feelings with virtual experiences. Our study encompassed N=105 participants, 393 friends who contributed their perspectives, over 8,300 collected tweets, and 2,000 media images. Results indicated a 28.67% similarity between images and real-world emotions, while tweets exhibited a 75.88% alignment with real-world feelings. Additionally, the statistical significance confirmed that the observed disparities in sentiment proportions.