Qiang Liu

Haisong Gong, Weizhi Xu, Shu wu et al.

Fact checking aims to predict claim veracity by reasoning over multiple evidence pieces. It usually involves evidence retrieval and veracity reasoning. In this paper, we focus on the latter, reasoning over unstructured text and structured table information. Previous works have primarily relied on fine-tuning pretrained language models or training homogeneous-graph-based models. Despite their effectiveness, we argue that they fail to explore the rich semantic information underlying the evidence with different structures. To address this, we propose a novel word-level Heterogeneous-graph-based model for Fact Checking over unstructured and structured information, namely HeterFC. Our approach leverages a heterogeneous evidence graph, with words as nodes and thoughtfully designed edges representing different evidence properties. We perform information propagation via a relational graph neural network, facilitating interactions between claims and evidence. An attention-based method is utilized to integrate information, combined with a language model for generating predictions. We introduce a multitask loss function to account for potential inaccuracies in evidence retrieval. Comprehensive experiments on the large fact checking dataset FEVEROUS demonstrate the effectiveness of HeterFC. Code will be released at: https://github.com/Deno-V/HeterFC.

Zewen Long, Liang Wang, Shu Wu et al.

With their vast open-world knowledge and reasoning abilities, large language models (LLMs) have become a promising tool for sequential recommendation. Researchers have explored various methods to harness these capabilities, but most existing approaches rely on simple input-output prompting, failing to effectively bridge the gap between LLMs' general knowledge and the specific needs of recommendation tasks. While reasoning strategies like chain-of-thought (CoT) have been introduced to enhance performance, they often produce inaccurate recommendations due to underutilized user preference information and insufficient reasoning depth. To address these challenges, we propose GOT4Rec, a novel sequential recommendation method leveraging the graph of thoughts (GoT) reasoning strategy. Our method focuses on three key types of information in user histories: short-term interests, long-term interests and collaborative information from other users. It enables LLMs to reason independently and generate recommendations, subsequently aggregating results to derive final items. This method allows LLMs, with enhanced reasoning capabilities, to better utilize the user sequence information, producing more accurate recommendations and comprehensive explanations. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of GOT4Rec, outperforming existing state-of-the-art baselines with an average improvement of 37.11%. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GOT4Rec.