Robert Timmerman

Biling Wang, Michael Dohopolski, Ti Bai et al.

We evaluated the temporal performance of a deep learning (DL) based artificial intelligence (AI) model for auto segmentation in prostate radiotherapy, seeking to correlate its efficacy with changes in clinical landscapes. Our study involved 1328 prostate cancer patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy from January 2006 to August 2022 at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. We trained a UNet based segmentation model on data from 2006 to 2011 and tested it on data from 2012 to 2022 to simulate real world clinical deployment. We measured the model performance using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), visualized the trends in contour quality using exponentially weighted moving average (EMA) curves. Additionally, we performed Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test to analyze the differences in DSC distributions across distinct periods, and multiple linear regression to investigate the impact of various clinical factors. The model exhibited peak performance in the initial phase (from 2012 to 2014) for segmenting the prostate, rectum, and bladder. However, we observed a notable decline in performance for the prostate and rectum after 2015, while bladder contour quality remained stable. Key factors that impacted the prostate contour quality included physician contouring styles, the use of various hydrogel spacer, CT scan slice thickness, MRI-guided contouring, and using intravenous (IV) contrast. Rectum contour quality was influenced by factors such as slice thickness, physician contouring styles, and the use of various hydrogel spacers. The bladder contour quality was primarily affected by using IV contrast. This study highlights the challenges in maintaining AI model performance consistency in a dynamic clinical setting. It underscores the need for continuous monitoring and updating of AI models to ensure their ongoing effectiveness and relevance in patient care.

Yajun Yu, Steve Jiang, Robert Timmerman et al.

Personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (PULSAR) is a novel treatment that delivers radiation in pulses of protracted intervals. Accurate prediction of gross tumor volume (GTV) changes through regression models has substantial prognostic value. This study aims to develop a multi-omics based support vector regression (SVR) model for predicting GTV change. A retrospective cohort of 39 patients with 69 brain metastases was analyzed, based on radiomics (MRI images) and dosiomics (dose maps) features. Delta features were computed to capture relative changes between two time points. A feature selection pipeline using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) algorithm with weight- or frequency-based ranking criterion was implemented. SVR models with various kernels were evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2) and relative root mean square error (RRMSE). Five-fold cross-validation with 10 repeats was employed to mitigate the limitation of small data size. Multi-omics models that integrate radiomics, dosiomics, and their delta counterparts outperform individual-omics models. Delta-radiomic features play a critical role in enhancing prediction accuracy relative to features at single time points. The top-performing model achieves an R2 of 0.743 and an RRMSE of 0.022. The proposed multi-omics SVR model shows promising performance in predicting continuous change of GTV. It provides a more quantitative and personalized approach to assist patient selection and treatment adjustment in PULSAR.

Hao Peng, Casey Moore, Debabrata Saha et al.

PULSAR (personalized, ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy) is the adaptation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy towards personalized cancer management. For the first time, we applied a transformer-based attention mechanism to investigate the underlying interactions between combined PULSAR and PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy based on a murine cancer model (Lewis Lung Carcinoma, LLC). The proposed approach is able to predict the trend of tumor volume change semi-quantitatively, and excels in identifying the potential causal relationships through both self-attention and cross-attention scores.