Guillermo Ruíz

Daniela Moctezuma, Tania Ramírez-delReal, Guillermo Ruiz et al.

Video captioning is the process of describing the content of a sequence of images capturing its semantic relationships and meanings. Dealing with this task with a single image is arduous, not to mention how difficult it is for a video (or images sequence). The amount and relevance of the applications of video captioning are vast, mainly to deal with a significant amount of video recordings in video surveillance, or assisting people visually impaired, to mention a few. To analyze where the efforts of our community to solve the video captioning task are, as well as what route could be better to follow, this manuscript presents an extensive review of more than 105 papers for the period of 2016 to 2021. As a result, the most-used datasets and metrics are identified. Also, the main approaches used and the best ones. We compute a set of rankings based on several performance metrics to obtain, according to its performance, the best method with the best result on the video captioning task. Finally, some insights are concluded about which could be the next steps or opportunity areas to improve dealing with this complex task.

Othón González-Chávez, Guillermo Ruiz, Daniela Moctezuma et al.

Image Captioning is a current research task to describe the image content using the objects and their relationships in the scene. To tackle this task, two important research areas converge, artificial vision, and natural language processing. In Image Captioning, as in any computational intelligence task, the performance metrics are crucial for knowing how well (or bad) a method performs. In recent years, it has been observed that classical metrics based on n-grams are insufficient to capture the semantics and the critical meaning to describe the content in an image. Looking to measure how well or not the set of current and more recent metrics are doing, in this article, we present an evaluation of several kinds of Image Captioning metrics and a comparison between them using the well-known MS COCO dataset. The metrics were selected from the most used in prior works, they are those based on $n$-grams as BLEU, SacreBLEU, METEOR, ROGUE-L, CIDEr, SPICE, and those based on embeddings, such as BERTScore and CLIPScore. For this, we designed two scenarios; 1) a set of artificially build captions with several qualities, and 2) a comparison of some state-of-the-art Image Captioning methods. Interesting findings were found trying to answer the questions: Are the current metrics helping to produce high-quality captions? How do actual metrics compare to each other? What are the metrics really measuring?

Guillermo Ruiz, Tania Ramírez, Daniela Moctezuma

Image captioning has become an essential Vision & Language research task. It is about predicting the most accurate caption given a specific image or video. The research community has achieved impressive results by continuously proposing new models and approaches to improve the overall model's performance. Nevertheless, despite increasing proposals, the performance metrics used to measure their advances have remained practically untouched through the years. A probe of that, nowadays metrics like BLEU, METEOR, CIDEr, and ROUGE are still very used, aside from more sophisticated metrics such as BertScore and ClipScore. Hence, it is essential to adjust how are measure the advances, limitations, and scopes of the new image captioning proposals, as well as to adapt new metrics to these new advanced image captioning approaches. This work proposes a new evaluation metric for the image captioning problem. To do that, first, it was generated a human-labeled dataset to assess to which degree the captions correlate with the image's content. Taking these human scores as ground truth, we propose a new metric, and compare it with several well-known metrics, from classical to newer ones. Outperformed results were also found, and interesting insights were presented and discussed.

Eric S. Tellez, Daniela Moctezuma, Sabino Miranda et al.

Spanish is one of the most spoken languages in the globe, but not necessarily Spanish is written and spoken in the same way in different countries. Understanding local language variations can help to improve model performances on regional tasks, both understanding local structures and also improving the message's content. For instance, think about a machine learning engineer who automatizes some language classification task on a particular region or a social scientist trying to understand a regional event with echoes on social media; both can take advantage of dialect-based language models to understand what is happening with more contextual information hence more precision. This manuscript presents and describes a set of regionalized resources for the Spanish language built on four-year Twitter public messages geotagged in 26 Spanish-speaking countries. We introduce word embeddings based on FastText, language models based on BERT, and per-region sample corpora. We also provide a broad comparison among regions covering lexical and semantical similarities; as well as examples of using regional resources on message classification tasks.