Geraldo F. Oliveira

Maurus Item, Juan Gómez-Luna, Yuxin Guo et al.

Processing-in-memory (PIM) promises to alleviate the data movement bottleneck in modern computing systems. However, current real-world PIM systems have the inherent disadvantage that their hardware is more constrained than in conventional processors (CPU, GPU), due to the difficulty and cost of building processing elements near or inside the memory. As a result, general-purpose PIM architectures support fairly limited instruction sets and struggle to execute complex operations such as transcendental functions and other hard-to-calculate operations (e.g., square root). These operations are particularly important for some modern workloads, e.g., activation functions in machine learning applications. In order to provide support for transcendental (and other hard-to-calculate) functions in general-purpose PIM systems, we present \emph{TransPimLib}, a library that provides CORDIC-based and LUT-based methods for trigonometric functions, hyperbolic functions, exponentiation, logarithm, square root, etc. We develop an implementation of TransPimLib for the UPMEM PIM architecture and perform a thorough evaluation of TransPimLib's methods in terms of performance and accuracy, using microbenchmarks and three full workloads (Blackscholes, Sigmoid, Softmax). We open-source all our code and datasets at~\url{https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/transpimlib}.

Geraldo F. Oliveira, Juan Gómez-Luna, Saugata Ghose et al.

Neural networks (NNs) are growing in importance and complexity. A neural network's performance (and energy efficiency) can be bound either by computation or memory resources. The processing-in-memory (PIM) paradigm, where computation is placed near or within memory arrays, is a viable solution to accelerate memory-bound NNs. However, PIM architectures vary in form, where different PIM approaches lead to different trade-offs. Our goal is to analyze, discuss, and contrast DRAM-based PIM architectures for NN performance and energy efficiency. To do so, we analyze three state-of-the-art PIM architectures: (1) UPMEM, which integrates processors and DRAM arrays into a single 2D chip; (2) Mensa, a 3D-stack-based PIM architecture tailored for edge devices; and (3) SIMDRAM, which uses the analog principles of DRAM to execute bit-serial operations. Our analysis reveals that PIM greatly benefits memory-bound NNs: (1) UPMEM provides 23x the performance of a high-end GPU when the GPU requires memory oversubscription for a general matrix-vector multiplication kernel; (2) Mensa improves energy efficiency and throughput by 3.0x and 3.1x over the Google Edge TPU for 24 Google edge NN models; and (3) SIMDRAM outperforms a CPU/GPU by 16.7x/1.4x for three binary NNs. We conclude that the ideal PIM architecture for NN models depends on a model's distinct attributes, due to the inherent architectural design choices.

Juan Gómez-Luna, Yuxin Guo, Sylvan Brocard et al.

Training machine learning algorithms is a computationally intensive process, which is frequently memory-bound due to repeatedly accessing large training datasets. As a result, processor-centric systems (e.g., CPU, GPU) suffer from costly data movement between memory units and processing units, which consumes large amounts of energy and execution cycles. Memory-centric computing systems, i.e., computing systems with processing-in-memory (PIM) capabilities, can alleviate this data movement bottleneck. Our goal is to understand the potential of modern general-purpose PIM architectures to accelerate machine learning training. To do so, we (1) implement several representative classic machine learning algorithms (namely, linear regression, logistic regression, decision tree, K-means clustering) on a real-world general-purpose PIM architecture, (2) characterize them in terms of accuracy, performance and scaling, and (3) compare to their counterpart implementations on CPU and GPU. Our experimental evaluation on a memory-centric computing system with more than 2500 PIM cores shows that general-purpose PIM architectures can greatly accelerate memory-bound machine learning workloads, when the necessary operations and datatypes are natively supported by PIM hardware. To our knowledge, our work is the first one to evaluate training of machine learning algorithms on a real-world general-purpose PIM architecture.

F. Nisa Bostanci, Haocong Luo, Ataberk Olgun et al.

A MICRO 2024 best paper runner-up publication (the Mess paper) with all three artifact badges awarded (including ``Reproducible'') proposes a new benchmark to evaluate real and simulated memory system performance. The publication contends that Ramulator 2.0 and DAMOV (ZSim+Ramulator) (along with other existing memory system simulators) ``poorly resemble the actual system performance'' and asserts that their simulator is better. In this paper, we show that the Mess paper has 1) demonstrable technical misconfigurations, 2) methodological errors in interpreting simulation statistics, and 3) an incomplete artifact that makes its key results irreproducible. We demonstrate that the Ramulator 2.0 simulation results reported in the Mess paper are incorrect due to multiple configuration errors instead of inherent simulation inaccuracy claimed by the Mess paper. We show that by correctly configuring Ramulator 2.0, Ramulator 2.0's simulated memory system performance actually resembles real system characteristics well, and thus a key claimed contribution of the Mess paper is factually incorrect. We also identify that the DAMOV simulation results in the Mess paper use wrong simulation statistics that are unrelated to the simulated DRAM performance. We show that DAMOV's simulated DRAM latency is not constant, in contrast to the Mess paper's claim. Moreover, the Mess paper's artifact repository lacks the necessary sources to fully reproduce all the Mess paper's results. We find that the experiment scripts use simulator executables and other resources that are neither described in the Mess paper nor found in the artifact repository. We strongly encourage the computer architecture community to consider our corrections to the Ramulator 2.0 and DAMOV results of the Mess paper to prevent the propagation of inaccurate and misleading results and to maintain the reliability of the scientific record.