Nejat Arınık

Noé Cecillon, Vincent Labatut, Richard Dufour et al.

Graphs are ubiquitous for modeling complex systems involving structured data and relationships. Consequently, graph representation learning, which aims to automatically learn low-dimensional representations of graphs, has drawn a lot of attention in recent years. The overwhelming majority of existing methods handle unsigned graphs. However, signed graphs appear in an increasing number of application domains to model systems involving two types of opposed relationships. Several authors took an interest in signed graphs and proposed methods for providing vertex-level representations, but only one exists for whole-graph representations, and it can handle only fully connected graphs. In this article, we tackle this issue by proposing two approaches to learning whole-graph representations of general signed graphs. The first is a SG2V, a signed generalization of the whole-graph embedding method Graph2vec that relies on a modification of the Weisfeiler--Lehman relabelling procedure. The second one is WSGCN, a whole-graph generalization of the signed vertex embedding method SGCN that relies on the introduction of master nodes into the GCN. We propose several variants of both these approaches. A bottleneck in the development of whole-graph-oriented methods is the lack of data. We constitute a benchmark composed of three collections of signed graphs with corresponding ground truths. We assess our methods on this benchmark, and our results show that the signed whole-graph methods learn better representations for this task. Overall, the baseline obtains an F-measure score of 58.57, when SG2V and WSGCN reach 73.01 and 81.20, respectively. Our source code and benchmark dataset are both publicly available online.

Nejat Arinik, Vincent Labatut, Rosa Figueiredo

In the context of cluster analysis and graph partitioning, many external evaluation measures have been proposed in the literature to compare two partitions of the same set. This makes the task of selecting the most appropriate measure for a given situation a challenge for the end user. However, this issue is overlooked in the literature. Researchers tend to follow tradition and use the standard measures of their field, although they often became standard only because previous researchers started consistently using them. In this work, we propose a new empirical evaluation framework to solve this issue, and help the end user selecting an appropriate measure for their application. For a collection of candidate measures, it first consists in describing their behavior by computing them for a generated dataset of partitions, obtained by applying a set of predefined parametric partition transformations. Second, our framework performs a regression analysis to characterize the measures in terms of how they are affected by these parameters and transformations. This allows both describing and comparing the measures. Our approach is not tied to any specific measure or application, so it can be applied to any situation. We illustrate its relevance by applying it to a selection of standard measures, and show how it can be put in practice through two concrete use cases.

Nejat Arinik, Rosa Figueiredo, Vincent Labatut

In order to study real-world systems, many applied works model them through signed graphs, i.e. graphs whose edges are labeled as either positive or negative. Such a graph is considered as structurally balanced when it can be partitioned into a number of modules, such that positive (resp. negative) edges are located inside (resp. in-between) the modules. When it is not the case, authors look for the closest partition to such balance, a problem called Correlation Clustering (CC). Due to the complexity of the CC problem, the standard approach is to find a single optimal partition and stick to it, even if other optimal or high scoring solutions possibly exist. In this work, we study the space of optimal solutions of the CC problem, on a collection of synthetic complete graphs. We show empirically that under certain conditions, there can be many optimal partitions of a signed graph. Some of these are very different and thus provide distinct perspectives on the system, as illustrated on a small real-world graph. This is an important result, as it implies that one may have to find several, if not all, optimal solutions of the CC problem, in order to properly study the considered system.