Dennis Johan Loevlie

Ethan Harvey, Dennis Johan Loevlie, Michael C. Hughes

We consider training classifiers for 3D medical images using only one binary label for the entire volume rather than a label for each 2D slice. In such weakly supervised settings, can we learn accurate classifiers for slice-level predictions? Attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) can produce an attention score for every slice. Yet recent work demonstrates that a simple center-focused baseline that ignores image content can outperform attention-based and transformer-based MIL at slice-level classification of 3D brain scans. We show this baseline also outperforms existing MIL at slice-level classification of thoracic and abdominal CT scans. Motivated by this baseline, we propose Normal Guidance, a regularization technique that encourages the learned attention distribution to follow a bell-shaped curve. Across three medical imaging datasets totaling over 4 million 2D slices, we show our Normal Guidance enables attention-based and transformer-based MIL methods to deliver significantly better slice-level localization than the state-of-the-art while remaining competitive at whole-scan classification.

Ethan Harvey, Dennis Johan Loevlie, Amir Ali Satani et al.

Despite being resource-intensive to train, 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been the standard approach to classify CT and MRI scans. Recent work suggests that deep multiple instance learning (MIL) may be a more efficient alternative for 3D brain scans, especially when the pre-trained image encoder used to embed each 2D slice is frozen and only the pooling operation and classifier are trained. In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of simple MIL, attention-based MIL, 3D CNNs, and 3D ViTs across three CT and four MRI datasets, including two large datasets of at least 10,000 scans. Our goal is to help resource-constrained practitioners understand which neural networks work well for 3D neuroimages and why. We further compare design choices for attention-based MIL, including different encoders, pooling operations, and architectural orderings. We find that simple mean pooling MIL, without any learnable attention, matches or outperforms recent MIL or 3D CNN alternatives on 4 of 6 moderate-sized tasks. This baseline remains competitive on two large datasets while being 25x faster to train. To explain mean pooling's success, we examine per-slice attention quality and a semi-synthetic dataset where we can derive the best possible classifier via a Bayes estimator. This analysis reveals the limits of existing MIL approaches and suggests routes for future improvements.

Ethan Harvey, Dennis Johan Loevlie, Michael C. Hughes

Multiple instance learning (MIL) is often used in medical imaging to classify high-resolution 2D images by processing patches or classify 3D volumes by processing slices. However, conventional MIL approaches treat instances separately, ignoring contextual relationships such as the appearance of nearby patches or slices that can be essential in real applications. We design a synthetic classification task where accounting for adjacent instance features is crucial for accurate prediction. We demonstrate the limitations of off-the-shelf MIL approaches by quantifying their performance compared to the optimal Bayes estimator for this task, which is available in closed-form. We empirically show that newer correlated MIL methods still do not achieve the best possible performance when trained with ten thousand training samples, each containing many instances.