Fuchao Yang

Fuchao Yang, Jianhong Cheng, Hui Liu et al.

In partial label learning (PLL), every sample is associated with a candidate label set comprising the ground-truth label and several noisy labels. The conventional PLL assumes the noisy labels are randomly generated (instance-independent), while in practical scenarios, the noisy labels are always instance-dependent and are highly related to the sample features, leading to the instance-dependent partial label learning (IDPLL) problem. Instance-dependent noisy label is a double-edged sword. On one side, it may promote model training as the noisy labels can depict the sample to some extent. On the other side, it brings high label ambiguity as the noisy labels are quite undistinguishable from the ground-truth label. To leverage the nuances of IDPLL effectively, for the first time we create class-wise embeddings for each sample, which allow us to explore the relationship of instance-dependent noisy labels, i.e., the class-wise embeddings in the candidate label set should have high similarity, while the class-wise embeddings between the candidate label set and the non-candidate label set should have high dissimilarity. Moreover, to reduce the high label ambiguity, we introduce the concept of class prototypes containing global feature information to disambiguate the candidate label set. Extensive experimental comparisons with twelve methods on six benchmark data sets, including four fine-grained data sets, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The code implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/Yangfc-ML/CEL.

Chongjie Si, Yidan Cui, Fuchao Yang et al.

Learning from inaccurate annotations has gained significant attention due to the high cost of precise labeling. However, despite the presence of erroneous labels, models trained on noisy data often retain the ability to make accurate predictions. This intriguing phenomenon raises a fundamental yet largely unexplored question: why models can still extract correct label information from inaccurate annotations remains unexplored. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive investigation into this issue. By analyzing weight matrices from both empirical and theoretical perspectives, we find that label inaccuracy primarily accumulates noise in lower singular components and subtly perturbs the principal subspace. Within a certain range, the principal subspaces of weights trained on inaccurate labels remain largely aligned with those learned from clean labels, preserving essential task-relevant information. We formally prove that the angles of principal subspaces exhibit minimal deviation under moderate label inaccuracy, explaining why models can still generalize effectively. Building on these insights, we propose LIP, a lightweight plug-in designed to help classifiers retain principal subspace information while mitigating noise induced by label inaccuracy. Extensive experiments on tasks with various inaccuracy conditions demonstrate that LIP consistently enhances the performance of existing algorithms. We hope our findings can offer valuable theoretical and practical insights to understand of model robustness under inaccurate supervision.