Robin Brochier

Robin Brochier, Antoine Gourru, Adrien Guille et al.

The scientific literature is growing faster than ever. Finding an expert in a particular scientific domain has never been as hard as today because of the increasing amount of publications and because of the ever growing diversity of expertise fields. To tackle this challenge, automatic expert finding algorithms rely on the vast scientific heterogeneous network to match textual queries with potential expert candidates. In this direction, document network embedding methods seem to be an ideal choice for building representations of the scientific literature. Citation and authorship links contain major complementary information to the textual content of the publications. In this paper, we propose a benchmark for expert finding in document networks by leveraging data extracted from a scientific citation network and three scientific question & answer websites. We compare the performances of several algorithms on these different sources of data and further study the applicability of embedding methods on an expert finding task.

Robin Brochier, Adrien Guille, Julien Velcin

Document network embedding aims at learning representations for a structured text corpus i.e. when documents are linked to each other. Recent algorithms extend network embedding approaches by incorporating the text content associated with the nodes in their formulations. In most cases, it is hard to interpret the learned representations. Moreover, little importance is given to the generalization to new documents that are not observed within the network. In this paper, we propose an interpretable and inductive document network embedding method. We introduce a novel mechanism, the Topic-Word Attention (TWA), that generates document representations based on the interplay between word and topic representations. We train these word and topic vectors through our general model, Inductive Document Network Embedding (IDNE), by leveraging the connections in the document network. Quantitative evaluations show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on various networks and we qualitatively show that our model produces meaningful and interpretable representations of the words, topics and documents.

Robin Brochier, Adrien Guille, Julien Velcin et al.

We propose a tool for experts finding applied to academic data generated by the start-up DSRT in the context of its application Peerus. A user may submit the title, the abstract and optionnally the authors and the journal of publication of a scientific article and the application then returns a list of experts, potential reviewers of the submitted article. The retrieval algorithm is a voting system based on a language modeling technique trained on several millions of scientific papers.

Robin Brochier, Adrien Guille, Benjamin Rothan et al.

Expertise is a loosely defined concept that is hard to formalize. Much research has focused on designing efficient algorithms for expert finding in large databases in various application domains. The evaluation of such recommender systems lies most of the time on human-annotated sets of experts associated with topics. The protocol of evaluation consists in using the namings or short descriptions of these topics as raw queries in order to rank the available set of candidates. Several measures taken from the field of information retrieval are then applied to rate the rankings of candidates against the ground truth set of experts. In this paper, we apply this topic-query evaluation methodology with the AMiner data and explore a new document-query methodology to evaluate experts retrieval from a set of queries sampled directly from the experts documents. Specifically, we describe two datasets extracted from AMiner, three baseline algorithms from the literature based on several document representations and provide experiment results to show that using a wide range of more realistic queries provides different evaluation results to the usual topic-queries.