Jaco van de Pol

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

In Layout Synthesis, the logical qubits of a quantum circuit are mapped to the physical qubits of a given quantum hardware platform, taking into account the connectivity of physical qubits. This involves inserting SWAP gates before an operation is applied on distant qubits. Optimal Layout Synthesis is crucial for practical Quantum Computing on current error-prone hardware: Minimizing the number of SWAP gates directly mitigates the error rates when running quantum circuits. In recent years, several approaches have been proposed for minimizing the required SWAP insertions. The proposed exact approaches can only scale to a small number of qubits. Proving that a number of swap insertions is optimal is much harder than producing near optimal mappings. In this paper, we provide two encodings for Optimal Layout Synthesis as a classical planning problem. We use optimal classical planners to synthesize the optimal layout for a standard set of benchmarks. Our results show the scalability of our approach compared to previous leading approaches. We can optimally map circuits with 9 qubits onto a 14 qubit platform, which could not be handled before by exact methods.

Irfansha Shaik, Valentin Mayer-Eichberger, Jaco van de Pol et al.

We address two bottlenecks for concise QBF encodings of maker-breaker positional games, like Hex and Tic-Tac-Toe. Our baseline is a QBF encoding with explicit variables for board positions and an explicit representation of winning configurations. The first improvement is inspired by lifted planning and avoids variables for explicit board positions, introducing a universal quantifier representing a symbolic board state. The second improvement represents the winning configurations implicitly, exploiting their structure. The paper evaluates the size of several encodings, depending on board size and game depth. It also reports the performance of QBF solvers on these encodings. We evaluate the techniques on Hex instances and also apply them to Harary's Tic-Tac-Toe. In particular, we study scalability to 19$\times$19 boards, played in human Hex tournaments.

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

Encoding 2-player games in QBF correctly and efficiently is challenging and error-prone. To enable concise specifications and uniform encodings of games played on grid boards, like Tic-Tac-Toe, Connect-4, Domineering, Pursuer-Evader and Breakthrough, we introduce Board-game Domain Definition Language (BDDL), inspired by the success of PDDL in the planning domain. We provide an efficient translation from BDDL into QBF, encoding the existence of a winning strategy of bounded depth. Our lifted encoding treats board positions symbolically and allows concise definitions of conditions, effects and winning configurations, relative to symbolic board positions. The size of the encoding grows linearly in the input model and the considered depth. To show the feasibility of such a generic approach, we use QBF solvers to compute the critical depths of winning strategies for instances of several known games. For several games, our work provides the first QBF encoding. Unlike plan validation in SAT-based planning, validating QBF-based winning strategies is difficult. We show how to validate winning strategies using QBF certificates and interactive game play.

Steffan Christ Sølvsten, Jaco van de Pol, Anna Blume Jakobsen et al.

We follow up on the idea of Lars Arge to rephrase the Reduce and Apply procedures of Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) as iterative I/O-efficient algorithms. We identify multiple avenues to simplify and improve the performance of his proposed algorithms. Furthermore, we extend the technique to other common BDD operations, many of which are not derivable using Apply operations alone, and we provide asymptotic improvements for the procedures that can be derived using Apply. These algorithms are implemented in a new BDD package, named Adiar. We see very promising results when comparing the performance of Adiar with conventional BDD packages that use recursive depth-first algorithms. For instances larger than 8.2 GiB, our algorithms, in parts using the disk, are 1.47 to 3.69 times slower compared to CUDD and Sylvan, exclusively using main memory. Yet, our proposed techniques are able to obtain this performance at a fraction of the main memory needed by conventional BDD packages to function. Furthermore, with Adiar we are able to manipulate BDDs that outgrow main memory and so surpass the limits of other BDD packages.

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

CNOT optimization plays a significant role in noise reduction for Quantum Circuits. Several heuristic and exact approaches exist for CNOT optimization. In this paper, we investigate more complicated variations of optimal synthesis by allowing qubit permutations and handling layout restrictions. We encode such problems into Planning, SAT, and QBF. We provide optimization for both CNOT gate count and circuit depth. For experimental evaluation, we consider standard T-gate optimized benchmarks and optimize CNOT sub-circuits. We show that allowing qubit permutations can further reduce up to 56% in CNOT count and 46% in circuit depth. In the case of optimally mapped circuits under layout restrictions, we observe a reduction up to 17% CNOT count and 19% CNOT depth.

Steffan Christ Sølvsten, Jaco van de Pol

Previous research on the Adiar BDD package has been successful at designing algorithms capable of handling large Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) stored in external memory. To do so, it uses consecutive sweeps through the BDDs to resolve computations. Yet, this approach has kept algorithms for multi-variable quantification, the relational product, and variable reordering out of its scope. In this work, we address this by introducing the nested sweeping framework. Here, multiple concurrent sweeps pass information between eachother to compute the result. We have implemented the framework in Adiar and used it to create a new external memory multi-variable quantification algorithm. Compared to conventional depth-first implementations, Adiar with nested sweeping is able to solve more instances of our benchmarks and/or solve them faster.

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

Clifford circuit optimization is an important step in the quantum compilation pipeline. Major compilers employ heuristic approaches. While they are fast, their results are often suboptimal. Minimization of noisy gates, like 2-qubit CNOT gates, is crucial for practical computing. Exact approaches have been proposed to fill the gap left by heuristic approaches. Among these are SAT based approaches that optimize gate count or depth, but they suffer from scalability issues. Further, they do not guarantee optimality on more important metrics like CNOT count or CNOT depth. A recent work proposed an exhaustive search only on Clifford circuits in a certain normal form to guarantee CNOT count optimality. But an exhaustive approach cannot scale beyond 6 qubits. In this paper, we incorporate search restricted to Clifford normal forms in a SAT encoding to guarantee CNOT count optimality. By allowing parallel plans, we propose a second SAT encoding that optimizes CNOT depth. By taking advantage of flexibility in SAT based approaches, we also handle connectivity restrictions in hardware platforms, and allow for qubit relabeling. We have implemented the above encodings and variations in our open source tool Q-Synth. In experiments, our encodings significantly outperform existing SAT approaches on random Clifford circuits. We consider practical VQE and Feynman benchmarks to compare with TKET and Qiskit compilers. In all-to-all connectivity, we observe reductions up to 32.1% in CNOT count and 48.1% in CNOT depth. Overall, we observe better results than TKET in the CNOT count and depth. We also experiment with connectivity restrictions of major quantum platforms. Compared to Qiskit, we observe up to 30.3% CNOT count and 35.9% CNOT depth further reduction.

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

Layout synthesis is mapping a quantum circuit to a quantum processor. SWAP gate insertions are needed for scheduling 2-qubit gates only on connected physical qubits. With the ever-increasing number of qubits in NISQ processors, scalable layout synthesis is of utmost importance. With large optimality gaps observed in heuristic approaches, scalable exact methods are needed. While recent exact and near-optimal approaches scale to moderate circuits, large deep circuits are still out of scope. In this work, we propose a SAT encoding based on parallel plans that apply 1 SWAP and a group of CNOTs at each time step. Using domain-specific information, we maintain optimality in parallel plans while scaling to large and deep circuits. From our results, we show the scalability of our approach which significantly outperforms leading exact and near-optimal approaches (up to 100x). For the first time, we can optimally map several 8, 14, and 16 qubit circuits onto 54, 80, and 127 qubit platforms with up to 17 SWAPs. While adding optimal SWAPs, we also report near-optimal depth in our mapped circuits.

Mario Gleirscher, Jaco van de Pol, Jim Woodcock

Formal methods were frequently shown to be effective and, perhaps because of that, practitioners are interested in using them more often. Still, these methods are far less applied than expected, particularly, in critical domains where they are strongly recommended and where they have the greatest potential. Our hypothesis is that formal methods still seem not to be applicable enough or ready for their intended use. In critical software engineering, what do we mean when we speak of a formal method? And what does it mean for such a method to be applicable both from a scientific and practical viewpoint? Based on what the literature tells about the first question, with this manifesto, we lay out a set of principles that when followed by a formal method give rise to its mature applicability in a given scope. Rather than exercising criticism of past developments, this manifesto strives to foster an increased use of formal methods to the maximum benefit.

Mario Gleirscher, Jaco van de Pol, Jim Woodcock

This volume contains the proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Applicable Formal Methods (AppFM 2021), 23 November 2021, held online as part of the 24th International Symposium on Formal Methods (FM). The aim of the AppFM workshop is to bring together researchers who improve and evaluate existing formal approaches and new variants in practical contexts and support the transfer of these approaches to software engineering practice.

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

Most classical planners use grounding as a preprocessing step, essentially reducing planning to propositional logic. However, grounding involves instantiating all action rules with concrete object combinations, and results in large encodings for SAT/QBF-based planners. This severe cost in memory becomes a main bottleneck when actions have many parameters, such as in the Organic Synthesis problems from the IPC 2018 competition. We provide a compact QBF encoding that is logarithmic in the number of objects and avoids grounding completely, by using universal quantification for object combinations. We show that we can solve some of the Organic Synthesis problems, which could not be handled before by any SAT/QBF based planners due to grounding.

Jens Bendisposto, Philipp Koerner, Michael Leuschel et al.

We present a symbolic reachability analysis approach for B that can provide a significant speedup over traditional explicit state model checking. The symbolic analysis is implemented by linking ProB to LTSmin, a high-performance language independent model checker. The link is achieved via LTSmin's PINS interface, allowing ProB to benefit from LTSmin's analysis algorithms, while only writing a few hundred lines of glue-code, along with a bridge between ProB and C using ZeroMQ. ProB supports model checking of several formal specification languages such as B, Event-B, Z and TLA. Our experiments are based on a wide variety of B-Method and Event-B models to demonstrate the efficiency of the new link. Among the tested categories are state space generation and deadlock detection; but action detection and invariant checking are also feasible in principle. In many cases we observe speedups of several orders of magnitude. We also compare the results with other approaches for improving model checking, such as partial order reduction or symmetry reduction. We thus provide a new scalable, symbolic analysis algorithm for the B-Method and Event-B, along with a platform to integrate other model checking improvements via LTSmin in the future.

Jeroen Meijer, Jaco van de Pol

We demonstrate the applicability of bandwidth and wavefront reduction algorithms to static variable ordering. In symbolic model checking event locality plays a major role in time and memory usage. For example, in Petri nets event locality can be captured by dependency matrices, where nonzero entries indicate whether a transition modifies a place. The quality of event locality has been expressed as a metric called (weighted) event span. The bandwidth of a matrix is a metric indicating the distance of nonzero elements to the diagonal. Wavefront is a metric indicating the degree of nonzeros on one end of the diagonal of the matrix. Bandwidth and wavefront are well studied metrics used in sparse matrix solvers. In this work we prove that span is limited by twice the bandwidth of a matrix. This observation makes bandwidth reduction algorithms useful for obtaining good variable orders. One major issue we address is that the reduction algorithms can only be applied on symmetric matrices, while the dependency matrices are asymmetric. We show that the Sloan algorithm executed on the total graph of the adjacency graph gives the best variable orders. Practically, we demonstrate that our work allows to call standard sparse matrix operations in Boost and ViennaCL, computing very good static variable orders in milliseconds. Future work is promising, because a whole new spectrum of more off-the-shelf algorithms, including metaheuristic ones, become available for variable ordering.

Kaylash Chaudhary, Ansgar Fehnker, Jaco van de Pol et al.

Bitcoin is a popular digital currency for online payments, realized as a decentralized peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin keeps a ledger of all transactions; the majority of the participants decides on the correct ledger. Since there is no trusted third party to guard against double spending, and inspired by its popularity, we would like to investigate the correctness of the Bitcoin protocol. Double spending is an important threat to electronic payment systems. Double spending would happen if one user could force a majority to believe that a ledger without his previous payment is the correct one. We are interested in the probability of success of such a double spending attack, which is linked to the computational power of the attacker. This paper examines the Bitcoin protocol and provides its formalization as an UPPAAL model. The model will be used to show how double spending can be done if the parties in the Bitcoin protocol behave maliciously, and with what probability double spending occurs.