Hong Chen

Huashan Chen, Zhenyu Qi, Haotang Li et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become central to automated code generation, yet existing approaches operate within a single-LLM paradigm: one model is selected and applied throughout the entire generation process. We observe that different LLMs exhibit complementary strengths: no single model dominates across all programming languages, algorithmic problem categories, or development stages. Multi-LLM collaboration, structured as per-stage, per-category routing rather than majority voting, produces higher-quality code than any individual model. Based on this observation, we propose PerfOrch, a multi-agent orchestration system that decomposes code generation into four collaborative agents: categorization, generation, debugging, and refinement. Each agent maintains a Memory module: a ranking matrix indexed by programming language and problem category, constructed from offline profiling and consulted at runtime to select the most suitable model for each task. We evaluate PerfOrch on two benchmarks, HumanEval-X and EffiBench-X, totaling 2,500 problems across five languages (Python, Java, C++, Go, and Rust). PerfOrch achieves average pass@1 rates of 97.19% on HumanEval-X and 95.83% on EffiBench-X, improving over the strongest single-model pipeline by 1.22-14.58 percentage points across languages. Notably, Memory rankings constructed solely from HumanEval-X profiling generalize to the entirely unseen EffiBench-X benchmark without re-profiling, demonstrating that the complementary-strength patterns PerfOrch exploits are properties of the models rather than artifacts of a specific problem distribution. Beyond correctness, PerfOrch improves execution time for 61-90% of solved problems with mean speedups of 4.7-29.9%, matching the refinement coverage of exhaustive multi-model evaluation at roughly half the token cost.

Biyang Guo, He Wang, Wenyilin Xiao et al.

In the burgeoning field of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and LLaMA, Prompt Engineering (PE) is renowned for boosting zero-shot or in-context learning (ICL) through prompt modifications. Yet, the realm of the sample design for downstream fine-tuning, crucial for task-specific LLM adaptation, is largely unexplored. This paper introduces Sample Design Engineering (SDE), a methodical approach to enhancing LLMs' post-tuning performance by refining input, output, and reasoning designs. We conduct a series of in-domain (ID) and out-of-domain (OOD) experiments to assess the impact of various design options on LLMs' downstream performance, revealing several intriguing patterns that hold consistently across different LLMs. Based on these insights, we propose an integrated SDE strategy, combining the most effective options, and validate its consistent superiority over heuristic sample designs in complex downstream tasks like multi-aspect sentiment analysis, event extraction, and nested entity recognition. Additionally, analyses of LLMs' inherent prompt/output perplexity, zero-shot, and ICL abilities illustrate that good PE strategies may not always translate to good SDE strategies. Code available at https://github.com/beyondguo/LLM-Tuning.