3.8LGMay 17, 2023Code
Comparison of Transfer Learning based Additive Manufacturing Models via A Case StudyYifan Tang, M. Rahmani Dehaghani, G. Gary Wang
Transfer learning (TL) based additive manufacturing (AM) modeling is an emerging field to reuse the data from historical products and mitigate the data insufficiency in modeling new products. Although some trials have been conducted recently, the inherent challenges of applying TL in AM modeling are seldom discussed, e.g., which source domain to use, how much target data is needed, and whether to apply data preprocessing techniques. This paper aims to answer those questions through a case study defined based on an open-source dataset about metal AM products. In the case study, five TL methods are integrated with decision tree regression (DTR) and artificial neural network (ANN) to construct six TL-based models, whose performances are then compared with the baseline DTR and ANN in a proposed validation framework. The comparisons are used to quantify the performance of applied TL methods and are discussed from the perspective of similarity, training data size, and data preprocessing. Finally, the source AM domain with larger qualitative similarity and a certain range of target-to-source training data size ratio are recommended. Besides, the data preprocessing should be performed carefully to balance the modeling performance and the performance improvement due to TL.
6.4LGJan 4, 2024
Real-Time 2D Temperature Field Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Physics-Informed Neural NetworksPouyan Sajadi, Mostafa Rahmani Dehaghani, Yifan Tang et al.
Accurately predicting the temperature field in metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes is critical to preventing overheating, adjusting process parameters, and ensuring process stability. While physics-based computational models offer precision, they are often time-consuming and unsuitable for real-time predictions and online control in iterative design scenarios. Conversely, machine learning models rely heavily on high-quality datasets, which can be costly and challenging to obtain within the metal AM domain. Our work addresses this by introducing a physics-informed neural network framework specifically designed for temperature field prediction in metal AM. This framework incorporates a physics-informed input, physics-informed loss function, and a Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) architecture. Utilizing real-time temperature data from the process, our model predicts 2D temperature fields for future timestamps across diverse geometries, deposition patterns, and process parameters. We validate the proposed framework in two scenarios: full-field temperature prediction for a thin wall and 2D temperature field prediction for cylinder and cubic parts, demonstrating errors below 3% and 1%, respectively. Our proposed framework exhibits the flexibility to be applied across diverse scenarios with varying process parameters, geometries, and deposition patterns.
7.9LGJan 16, 2024
Selecting Subsets of Source Data for Transfer Learning with Applications in Metal Additive ManufacturingYifan Tang, M. Rahmani Dehaghani, Pouyan Sajadi et al.
Considering data insufficiency in metal additive manufacturing (AM), transfer learning (TL) has been adopted to extract knowledge from source domains (e.g., completed printings) to improve the modeling performance in target domains (e.g., new printings). Current applications use all accessible source data directly in TL with no regard to the similarity between source and target data. This paper proposes a systematic method to find appropriate subsets of source data based on similarities between the source and target datasets for a given set of limited target domain data. Such similarity is characterized by the spatial and model distance metrics. A Pareto frontier-based source data selection method is developed, where the source data located on the Pareto frontier defined by two similarity distance metrics are selected iteratively. The method is integrated into an instance-based TL method (decision tree regression model) and a model-based TL method (fine-tuned artificial neural network). Both models are then tested on several regression tasks in metal AM. Comparison results demonstrate that 1) the source data selection method is general and supports integration with various TL methods and distance metrics, 2) compared with using all source data, the proposed method can find a small subset of source data from the same domain with better TL performance in metal AM regression tasks involving different processes and machines, and 3) when multiple source domains exist, the source data selection method could find the subset from one source domain to obtain comparable or better TL performance than the model constructed using data from all source domains.