LGOct 24, 2023Code
Power-Enhanced Residual Network for Function Approximation and Physics-Informed Inverse ProblemsAmir Noorizadegan, D. L. Young, Y. C. Hon et al.
In this study, we investigate how the updating of weights during forward operation and the computation of gradients during backpropagation impact the optimization process, training procedure, and overall performance of the neural network, particularly the multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs). This paper introduces a novel neural network structure called the Power-Enhancing residual network, inspired by highway network and residual network, designed to improve the network's capabilities for both smooth and non-smooth functions approximation in 2D and 3D settings. By incorporating power terms into residual elements, the architecture enhances the stability of weight updating, thereby facilitating better convergence and accuracy. The study explores network depth, width, and optimization methods, showing the architecture's adaptability and performance advantages. Consistently, the results emphasize the exceptional accuracy of the proposed Power-Enhancing residual network, particularly for non-smooth functions. Real-world examples also confirm its superiority over plain neural network in terms of accuracy, convergence, and efficiency. Moreover, the proposed architecture is also applied to solving the inverse Burgers' equation, demonstrating superior performance. In conclusion, the Power-Enhancing residual network offers a versatile solution that significantly enhances neural network capabilities by emphasizing the importance of stable weight updates for effective training in deep neural networks. The codes implemented are available at: \url{https://github.com/CMMAi/ResNet_for_PINN}.
CEApr 23
Scaling of Gaussian Kolmogorov--Arnold NetworksAmir Noorizadegan, Sifan Wang
The Gaussian scale parameter \(ε\) is central to the behavior of Gaussian Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs), yet its role in deep edge-based architectures has not been studied systematically. In this paper, we investigate how \(ε\) affects Gaussian KANs through first-layer feature geometry, conditioning, and approximation behavior. Our central observation is that scale selection is governed primarily by the first layer, since it is the only layer constructed directly on the input domain and any loss of distinguishability introduced there cannot be recovered by later layers. From this viewpoint, we analyze the first-layer feature matrix and identify a practical operating interval, \[ ε\in \left[\frac{1}{G-1},\frac{2}{G-1}\right], \] where \(G\) denotes the number of Gaussian centers. For the standard shared-center Gaussian KAN used in current practice, we interpret this interval not as a universal optimality result, but as a stable and effective design rule, and validate it through brute-force sweeps over \(ε\) across function-approximation problems with different collocation densities, grid resolutions, network architectures, and input dimensions, as well as a physics-informed Helmholtz problem. We further show that this range is useful for fixed-scale selection, variable-scale constructions, constrained training of \(ε\), and efficient scale search using early training MSE. Finally, using a matched Chebyshev reference, we show that a properly scaled Gaussian KAN can already be competitive in accuracy relative to another standard KAN basis. In this way, the paper positions scale selection as a practical design principle for Gaussian KANs rather than as an ad hoc hyperparameter choice.
MLMay 20
Adaptive RBF-KAN: A Comparative Evaluation of Dynamic Shape Parameters in Kolmogorov-Arnold NetworksRoberto Cavoretto, Alessandra De Rossi, Adeeba Haider et al.
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) approximate multivariate functions using learnable univariate edge functions, typically parameterized by B-spline bases. Although effective, spline-based implementations can be computationally expensive. A modified version of KANs, called FastKAN, improves efficiency by replacing splines with Gaussian radial basis functions (RBFs), but it relies on a fixed kernel and shape parameter. In this work, we extend the RBF-based KAN framework by introducing a broader family of radial basis kernels and by initializing the kernel shape parameter using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that integrates LOOCV-based kernel scale estimation with deep KAN training. We also introduce Matérn and Wendland kernels into the KAN framework for the first time, enabling more flexible basis representations beyond the Gaussian kernel used in FastKAN. The LOOCV estimate provides a data-driven initialization of the kernel scale, which is subsequently refined during network training. The proposed adaptive RBF-KAN is evaluated on several two-dimensional benchmark functions. The results highlight the importance of kernel selection and adaptive shape parameters, with different kernels showing advantages for smooth functions, discontinuities, and oscillatory patterns. Overall, combining LOOCV-based initialization with adaptive kernel learning provides a practical strategy for improving RBF-based KAN models.
LGOct 28, 2025Code
A Practitioner's Guide to Kolmogorov-Arnold NetworksAmir Noorizadegan, Sifan Wang, Leevan Ling
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to traditional Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), inspired by the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem. Unlike MLPs, which use fixed activation functions on nodes, KANs employ learnable univariate basis functions on edges, offering enhanced expressivity and interpretability. This review provides a systematic and comprehensive overview of the rapidly expanding KAN landscape, moving beyond simple performance comparisons to offer a structured synthesis of theoretical foundations, architectural variants, and practical implementation strategies. By collecting and categorizing a vast array of open-source implementations, we map the vibrant ecosystem supporting KAN development. We begin by bridging the conceptual gap between KANs and MLPs, establishing their formal equivalence and highlighting the superior parameter efficiency of the KAN formulation. A central theme of our review is the critical role of the basis function; we survey a wide array of choices, including B-splines, Chebyshev and Jacobi polynomials, ReLU compositions, Gaussian RBFs, and Fourier series, and analyze their respective trade-offs in terms of smoothness, locality, and computational cost. We then categorize recent advancements into a clear roadmap, covering techniques for improving accuracy, efficiency, and regularization. Key topics include physics-informed loss design, adaptive sampling, domain decomposition, hybrid architectures, and specialized methods for handling discontinuities. Finally, we provide a practical "Choose-Your-KAN" guide to help practitioners select appropriate architectures, and we conclude by identifying current research gaps. The associated GitHub repository https://github.com/AmirNoori68/kan-review complements this paper and serves as a structured reference for ongoing KAN research.