Dalila Ressi

Dalila Ressi, Alvise Spanò, Lorenzo Benetollo et al.

Smart contracts are central to a myriad of critical blockchain applications, from financial transactions to supply chain management. However, their adoption is hindered by security vulnerabilities that can result in significant financial losses. Most vulnerability detection tools and methods available nowadays leverage either static analysis methods or machine learning. Unfortunately, as valuable as they are, both approaches suffer from limitations that make them only partially effective. In this survey, we analyze the state of the art in machine-learning vulnerability detection for Ethereum smart contracts, by categorizing existing tools and methodologies, evaluating them, and highlighting their limitations. Our critical assessment unveils issues such as restricted vulnerability coverage and dataset construction flaws, providing us with new metrics to overcome the difficulties that restrain a sound comparison of existing solutions. Driven by our findings, we discuss best practices to enhance the accuracy, scope, and efficiency of vulnerability detection in smart contracts. Our guidelines address the known flaws while at the same time opening new avenues for research and development. By shedding light on current challenges and offering novel directions for improvement, we contribute to the advancement of secure smart contract development and blockchain technology as a whole.

Dalila Ressi, Riccardo Romanello, Sabina Rossi et al.

The increasing size of recently proposed Neural Networks makes it hard to implement them on embedded devices, where memory, battery and computational power are a non-trivial bottleneck. For this reason during the last years network compression literature has been thriving and a large number of solutions has been been published to reduce both the number of operations and the parameters involved with the models. Unfortunately, most of these reducing techniques are actually heuristic methods and usually require at least one re-training step to recover the accuracy. The need of procedures for model reduction is well-known also in the fields of Verification and Performances Evaluation, where large efforts have been devoted to the definition of quotients that preserve the observable underlying behaviour. In this paper we try to bridge the gap between the most popular and very effective network reduction strategies and formal notions, such as lumpability, introduced for verification and evaluation of Markov Chains. Elaborating on lumpability we propose a pruning approach that reduces the number of neurons in a network without using any data or fine-tuning, while completely preserving the exact behaviour. Relaxing the constraints on the exact definition of the quotienting method we can give a formal explanation of some of the most common reduction techniques.

Dalila Ressi, Alvise Spanò, Matteo Rizzo et al.

Reentrancy remains one of the most critical classes of vulnerabilities in Ethereum smart contracts, yet widely used detection tools and datasets continue to reflect outdated patterns and obsolete Solidity versions. This paper adopts a dependability-oriented perspective on reentrancy detection in Solidity 0.8+, assessing how reliably state-of-the-art static analyzers and AI-based techniques operate on modern code by putting them to the test on two fronts. We construct two manually verified benchmarks: an Aggregated Benchmark of 432 real-world contracts, consolidated and relabeled from prior datasets, and a Reentrancy Scenarios Dataset (RSD) of \chadded{143} handcrafted minimal working examples designed to isolate and stress-test individual reentrancy patterns. We then evaluate 12 formal-methods-based tools, 10 machine-learning models, and 9 large language models. On the Aggregated Benchmark, traditional tools and ML models achieve up to 0.87 F1, while the best LLMs reach 0.96 in a zero-shot setting. On the RSD, most tools fail on multiple scenarios, the top performer achieving an F1 of 0.76, whereas the strongest model attains 0.82. Overall, our results indicate that leading LLMs outperform the majority of existing detectors, highlighting concerning gaps in the robustness and maintainability of current reentrancy-analysis tools.

Cosimo Laneve, Alvise Spanò, Dalila Ressi et al.

We present an empirical evaluation of Large Language Models in code understanding associated with non-trivial, semantic-preserving program transformations such as copy propagation or constant folding. Our findings show that LLMs fail to judge semantic equivalence in approximately 41\% of cases when no context is provided and in 29\% when given a simple generic context. To improve accuracy, we advocate integrating LLMs with code-optimization tools to enhance training and facilitate more robust program understanding.