Jiwon Jeong

Junho Kim, Jiwon Jeong, Young Min Kim

We introduce a lightweight and accurate localization method that only utilizes the geometry of 2D-3D lines. Given a pre-captured 3D map, our approach localizes a panorama image, taking advantage of the holistic 360 view. The system mitigates potential privacy breaches or domain discrepancies by avoiding trained or hand-crafted visual descriptors. However, as lines alone can be ambiguous, we express distinctive yet compact spatial contexts from relationships between lines, namely the dominant directions of parallel lines and the intersection between non-parallel lines. The resulting representations are efficient in processing time and memory compared to conventional visual descriptor-based methods. Given the groups of dominant line directions and their intersections, we accelerate the search process to test thousands of pose candidates in less than a millisecond without sacrificing accuracy. We empirically show that the proposed 2D-3D matching can localize panoramas for challenging scenes with similar structures, dramatic domain shifts or illumination changes. Our fully geometric approach does not involve extensive parameter tuning or neural network training, making it a practical algorithm that can be readily deployed in the real world. Project page including the code is available through this link: https://82magnolia.github.io/fgpl/.

Jiwon Jeong, Donghee Han, Sungrae Hong et al.

Recent work has shown that large language models (LLMs) can enhance recommender systems by integrating collaborative filtering (CF) signals through hybrid prompting. However, most existing CF-LLM frameworks collapse explicit ratings into implicit or positive-only feedback, discarding the ordinal structure that conveys fine-grained preference strength. As a result, these models struggle to exploit graded semantics and nuanced preference distinctions. We propose Ordinal Semantic Anchoring (OSA), a hybrid CF-LLM framework that explicitly incorporates preference strength by modeling interaction-level user feedback. OSA represents ordinal preference levels as numeric textual tokens and uses their token embeddings as semantic anchors to align user-item interaction representations in the LLM latent space. Through strength-aware alignment across ordinal levels, OSA preserves preference semantics when integrating collaborative signals with LLMs. Experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that OSA consistently outperforms existing baselines, particularly in pairwise preference evaluation, highlighting its effectiveness in modeling fine-grained user preferences over prior CF-LLM methods.

Sungrae Hong, Jiwon Jeong, Jisu Shin et al.

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Whole Slide Image (WSI) diagnosis, offering effective learning with limited annotations. However, existing MIL frameworks overlook diagnostic priorities and fail to differentiate the severity of misclassifications in multiclass, leaving clinically critical errors unaddressed. We propose a mistake-severity-aware training strategy that organizes diagnostic classes into a hierarchical structure, with each level optimized using a severity-weighted cross-entropy loss that penalizes high-severity misclassifications more strongly. Additionally, hierarchical consistency is enforced through probabilistic alignment, a semantic feature remix applied to the instance bag to robustly train class priority and accommodate clinical cases involving multiple symptoms. An asymmetric Mikel's Wheel-based metric is also introduced to quantify the severity of errors specific to medical fields. Experiments on challenging public and real-world in-house datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly mitigates critical errors in MIL diagnosis compared to existing methods. We present additional experimental results on natural domain data to demonstrate the generalizability of our proposed method beyond medical contexts.

Irene Aldridge, Ellie Bae, Siddhesh Darak et al.

Municipal 311 call centers and complaint intake systems face a structural mismatch between incoming volume and classification capacity. The staff and heuristics available to triage, route, and prioritize complaints cannot scale with demand. This bottleneck produces differential service quality that follows income and racial lines (\cite{liu2024sla}). We develop an equity-centered reinforcement learning (RL) framework that augments call classification capacity across six New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) operational domains: boiler safety, crane and derrick oversight, heat and hot water complaints, housing complaint triage, scaffold safety, and Natural Area District (SNAD) protection. Rather than replacing human classifiers, our agents act as intelligent intake routers: learning to assign incoming complaints to action categories: escalate, batch, defer, inspect now. The proposed technique is designed to maximize throughput, minimize misclassification cost, and actively narrow historical equity gaps in service delivery. We formalize each domain as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) in which equitable classification coverage is a first-class reward objective. Post-hoc SHAP attribution reveals that complaint recurrence and neighborhood-level statistics are stronger predictors of actionable violations than raw complaint volume. This finding has direct implications for complaint routing given the demographic correlates of those features.

Jiwon Jeong, Hyeju Jang, Hogun Park

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has greatly improved our ability to process complex language. However, accurately detecting logical fallacies remains a significant challenge. This study presents a novel and effective prompt formulation approach for logical fallacy detection, applicable in both supervised (fine-tuned) and unsupervised (zero-shot) settings. Our method enriches input text incorporating implicit contextual information -- counterarguments, explanations, and goals -- which we query for validity within the context of the argument. We then rank these queries based on confidence scores to inform classification. We evaluate our approach across multiple datasets from 5 domains, covering 29 distinct fallacy types, using models from the GPT and LLaMA series. The results show substantial improvements over state-of-the-art models, with F1 score increases of up to 0.60 in zero-shot settings and up to 0.45 in fine-tuned models. Extensive analyses further illustrate why and how our method excels.

Ji-jun Park, Soo-joon Choi, Jiwon Jeong et al.

Large language models (LLMs) frequently encode factual and reasoning knowledge in their internal representations that is not faithfully reflected in their surface-level outputs -- a phenomenon known as \emph{latent knowledge}. Existing approaches to eliciting latent knowledge, such as Contrastive Consistency Search (CCS), rely on contrastive activation patterns and struggle with complex multi-step reasoning tasks, while mechanistic interpretability tools have primarily been used to \emph{understand} model behavior rather than to \emph{extract} hidden knowledge. We present \textbf{MechELK}, a unified three-stage framework that bridges mechanistic interpretability and latent knowledge elicitation. MechELK operates through: (1) \textbf{Locate} -- using Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) feature analysis and activation patching to identify knowledge-bearing representations; (2) \textbf{Verify} -- employing causal probing to distinguish genuine latent knowledge from spurious correlations; and (3) \textbf{Elicit} -- applying representation engineering to surface hidden knowledge without modifying model weights. Evaluated on TruthfulQA, a curated Deceptive Alignment benchmark, and the Quirky LM dataset, MechELK achieves an average elicitation accuracy of 84.7\%, outperforming CCS by 6.2\% and direct linear probing by 9.1\%. Crucially, MechELK successfully identifies latent knowledge in 78.3\% of cases where the model's surface output is incorrect or evasive, demonstrating its utility for AI safety applications including deceptive alignment detection.