6.4CRAug 13, 2025
Approximate DBSCAN under Differential PrivacyYuan Qiu, Ke Yi
This paper revisits the DBSCAN problem under differential privacy (DP). Existing DP-DBSCAN algorithms aim at publishing the cluster labels of the input points. However, we show that both empirically and theoretically, this approach cannot offer any utility in the published results. We therefore propose an alternative definition of DP-DBSCAN based on the notion of spans. We argue that publishing the spans actually better serves the purposes of visualization and classification of DBSCAN. Then we present a linear-time DP-DBSCAN algorithm achieving the sandwich quality guarantee in any constant dimensions, as well as matching lower bounds on the approximation ratio. A key building block in our algorithm is a linear-time algorithm for constructing a histogram under pure-DP, which is of independent interest. Finally, we conducted experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets to verify the practical performance of our DP-DBSCAN algorithm.
16.0CRApr 5, 2021
Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and StreamingZiyue Huang, Yuan Qiu, Ke Yi et al.
We study the fundamental problem of frequency estimation under both privacy and communication constraints, where the data is distributed among $k$ parties. We consider two application scenarios: (1) one-shot, where the data is static and the aggregator conducts a one-time computation; and (2) streaming, where each party receives a stream of items over time and the aggregator continuously monitors the frequencies. We adopt the model of multiparty differential privacy (MDP), which is more general than local differential privacy (LDP) and (centralized) differential privacy. Our protocols achieve optimality (up to logarithmic factors) permissible by the more stringent of the two constraints. In particular, when specialized to the $\varepsilon$-LDP model, our protocol achieves an error of $\sqrt{k}/(e^{Θ(\varepsilon)}-1)$ using $O(k\max\{ \varepsilon, \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \})$ bits of communication and $O(k \log u)$ bits of public randomness, where $u$ is the size of the domain.