Ramin Pishehvar

h-index1
3papers
2citations

3 Papers

8.8AIMay 5
From Intent to Execution: Composing Agentic Workflows with Agent Recommendation

Kishan Athrey, Ramin Pishehvar, Brian Riordan et al.

Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) built using AI agents fulfill a variety of user intents that may be used to design and build a family of related applications. However, the creation of such MAS currently involves manual composition of the plan, manual selection of appropriate agents, and manual creation of execution graphs. This paper introduces a framework for the automated creation of multi-agent systems which replaces multiple manual steps with an automated framework. The proposed framework consists of software modules and a workflow to orchestrate the requisite task- specific application. The modules include: an LLM-derived planner, a set of tasks described in natural language, a dynamic call graph, an orchestrator for map agents to tasks, and an agent recommender that finds the most suitable agent(s) from local and global agent registries. The agent recommender uses a two-stage information retrieval (IR) system comprising a fast retriever and an LLM-based re-ranker. We implemented a series of experiments exploring the choice of embedders, re- rankers, agent description enrichment, and supervising critique agent. We benchmarked this system end-to-end, evaluating the combination of planning, agent selection, and task completion, with our proposed approach. Our experimental results show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the- art in terms of the recall rate and is more robust and scalable compared to previous approaches. The critique agent holistically reevaluates both agent and tool recommendations against the overall plan. We show that the inclusion of the critique agent further enhances the recall score, proving that the comprehensive review and revision of task-based agent selection is an essential step in building end-to-end multi-agent systems.

2.0LGFeb 3, 2023
SPADE: Self-supervised Pretraining for Acoustic DisEntanglement

John Harvill, Jarred Barber, Arun Nair et al.

Self-supervised representation learning approaches have grown in popularity due to the ability to train models on large amounts of unlabeled data and have demonstrated success in diverse fields such as natural language processing, computer vision, and speech. Previous self-supervised work in the speech domain has disentangled multiple attributes of speech such as linguistic content, speaker identity, and rhythm. In this work, we introduce a self-supervised approach to disentangle room acoustics from speech and use the acoustic representation on the downstream task of device arbitration. Our results demonstrate that our proposed approach significantly improves performance over a baseline when labeled training data is scarce, indicating that our pretraining scheme learns to encode room acoustic information while remaining invariant to other attributes of the speech signal.

5.3AIJun 30
A Three-Phase Foundation Model for Tax-Aware Personalized Portfolio Management

Ramin Pishehvar

We present a three-phase deep reinforcement learning system for personalized portfolio management that addresses three limitations shared by all prior financial RL work: 1) ticker lock-in, 2) monolithic objectives , and 3) static user models. Phase 1 pretrains a ticker-identity-free cross asset encoder via self-supervised learning on a multi-asset corpus, augmented by a frozen parallel branch using Chronos, a T5-based time series foundation model, fused via a learned gating mechanism. To our knowledge, this is the first application of a time series foundation model to portfolio management RL. The encoder generalizes to any publicly traded asset via a 50-dimensional observable metadata vector that requires no retraining for new tickers. Phase 2 fine-tunes a MoE (Mixture of Experts) portfolio actor critic with PPO under an objective-conditioned reward that simultaneously serves six distinct investment goals sampled per episode: short-term alpha, short-term gain, long-term gain, capital preservation, tax-loss harvesting, and long-term-gains-only. A MoE architecture assigns each objective to a specialized expert head (momentum, growth, defensive, tax-aware), and a learned intent router blends experts based on the active objective and current market regime, which eliminates cross-objective gradient conflict. Phase 3 adds a lightweight personalization layer further adapted at inference time to each individual via a 76-parameter LoRA module fine-tuned on real brokerage transaction history, inferring investment objectives from revealed trading behavior rather than questionnaires. A natural language intent parser converts free-form goals directly into structured investment objective parameters.