Martin R. Albrecht, Miloš Prokop, Yixin Shen et al.
A fundamental computational problem is to find a shortest non-zero vector in Euclidean lattices, a problem known as the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP). This problem is believed to be hard even on quantum computers and thus plays a pivotal role in post-quantum cryptography. In this work we explore how (efficiently) Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices may be used to solve SVP. Specifically, we map the problem to that of finding the ground state of a suitable Hamiltonian. In particular, (i) we establish new bounds for lattice enumeration, this allows us to obtain new bounds (resp.~estimates) for the number of qubits required per dimension for any lattices (resp.~random q-ary lattices) to solve SVP; (ii) we exclude the zero vector from the optimization space by proposing (a) a different classical optimisation loop or alternatively (b) a new mapping to the Hamiltonian. These improvements allow us to solve SVP in dimension up to 28 in a quantum emulation, significantly more than what was previously achieved, even for special cases. Finally, we extrapolate the size of NISQ devices that is required to be able to solve instances of lattices that are hard even for the best classical algorithms and find that with approximately $10^3$ noisy qubits such instances can be tackled.
Divesh Aggarwal, Yanlin Chen, Rajendra Kumar et al.
The most important computational problem on lattices is the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP). In this paper, we present new algorithms that improve the state-of-the-art for provable classical/quantum algorithms for SVP. We present the following results. $\bullet$ A new algorithm for SVP that provides a smooth tradeoff between time complexity and memory requirement. For any positive integer $4\leq q\leq \sqrt{n}$, our algorithm takes $q^{13n+o(n)}$ time and requires $poly(n)\cdot q^{16n/q^2}$ memory. This tradeoff which ranges from enumeration ($q=\sqrt{n}$) to sieving ($q$ constant), is a consequence of a new time-memory tradeoff for Discrete Gaussian sampling above the smoothing parameter. $\bullet$ A quantum algorithm for SVP that runs in time $2^{0.950n+o(n)}$ and requires $2^{0.5n+o(n)}$ classical memory and poly(n) qubits. In Quantum Random Access Memory (QRAM) model this algorithm takes only $2^{0.835n+o(n)}$ time and requires a QRAM of size $2^{0.293n+o(n)}$, poly(n) qubits and $2^{0.5n}$ classical space. This improves over the previously fastest classical (which is also the fastest quantum) algorithm due to [ADRS15] that has a time and space complexity $2^{n+o(n)}$. $\bullet$ A classical algorithm for SVP that runs in time $2^{1.669n+o(n)}$ time and $2^{0.5n+o(n)}$ space. This improves over an algorithm of [CCL18] that has the same space complexity. The time complexity of our classical and quantum algorithms are obtained using a known upper bound on a quantity related to the lattice kissing number which is $2^{0.402n}$. We conjecture that for most lattices this quantity is a $2^{o(n)}$. Assuming that this is the case, our classical algorithm runs in time $2^{1.292n+o(n)}$, our quantum algorithm runs in time $2^{0.750n+o(n)}$ and our quantum algorithm in QRAM model runs in time $2^{0.667n+o(n)}$.
Xavier Bonnetain, Rémi Bricout, André Schrottenloher et al.
We present new classical and quantum algorithms for solving random subset-sum instances. First, we improve over the Becker-Coron-Joux algorithm (EUROCRYPT 2011) from $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(2^{0.291 n})$ downto $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(2^{0.283 n})$, using more general representations with values in $\{-1,0,1,2\}$. Next, we improve the state of the art of quantum algorithms for this problem in several directions. By combining the Howgrave-Graham-Joux algorithm (EUROCRYPT 2010) and quantum search, we devise an algorithm with asymptotic cost $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(2^{0.236 n})$, lower than the cost of the quantum walk based on the same classical algorithm proposed by Bernstein, Jeffery, Lange and Meurer (PQCRYPTO 2013). This algorithm has the advantage of using \emph{classical} memory with quantum random access, while the previously known algorithms used the quantum walk framework, and required \emph{quantum} memory with quantum random access. We also propose new quantum walks for subset-sum, performing better than the previous best time complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(2^{0.226 n})$ given by Helm and May (TQC 2018). We combine our new techniques to reach a time $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(2^{0.216 n})$. This time is dependent on a heuristic on quantum walk updates, formalized by Helm and May, that is also required by the previous algorithms. We show how to partially overcome this heuristic, and we obtain an algorithm with quantum time $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(2^{0.218 n})$ requiring only the standard classical subset-sum heuristics.