Valentina Pansanella

Giulio Rossetti, Massimo Stella, Rémy Cazabet et al.

In this paper we introduce Y, a new-generation digital twin designed to replicate an online social media platform. Digital twins are virtual replicas of physical systems that allow for advanced analyses and experimentation. In the case of social media, a digital twin such as Y provides a powerful tool for researchers to simulate and understand complex online interactions. {\tt Y} leverages state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) to replicate sophisticated agent behaviors, enabling accurate simulations of user interactions, content dissemination, and network dynamics. By integrating these aspects, Y offers valuable insights into user engagement, information spread, and the impact of platform policies. Moreover, the integration of LLMs allows Y to generate nuanced textual content and predict user responses, facilitating the study of emergent phenomena in online environments. To better characterize the proposed digital twin, in this paper we describe the rationale behind its implementation, provide examples of the analyses that can be performed on the data it enables to be generated, and discuss its relevance for multidisciplinary research.

Yangyang Luan, Camilla Ancona, Carmela Bernardo et al.

The concept of homophily is pervasive in online social media. While many empirical studies have relied on external sociodemographic traits to investigate it, significantly less is known about homophily at the cognitive level, that is, at the level of shared opinions or values. For such "value homophily", in this paper we study interval-based patterns of opinion homophily from a bounded confidence perspective. We consider three heterogeneous datasets from Reddit and Twitter covering polarizing issues, with user opinions quantified via sentiment analysis and fact-checking, and analyze the interaction networks formed by weaker (reply-based) and stronger (follow-based) social ties. Our findings show that users' interaction neighborhoods are significantly more concentrated in opinion space than expected by chance, with tie strength and issue polarization further amplifying this effect. Moreover, users often exhibit asymmetric tolerance ranges, with asymmetry typically directed toward locally mainstream positions rather than more radical or opposing ones. These findings support a bounded confidence interpretation of online value homophily.

Virginia Morini, Valentina Pansanella, Katherine Abramski et al.

Social media platforms are online fora where users engage in discussions, share content, and build connections. This review explores the dynamics of social interactions, user-generated contents, and biases within the context of social media analysis (analyzing works that use the tools offered by complex network analysis and natural language processing) through the lens of three key points of view: online debates, online support, and human-AI interactions. On the one hand, we delineate the phenomenon of online debates, where polarization, misinformation, and echo chamber formation often proliferate, driven by algorithmic biases and extreme mechanisms of homophily. On the other hand, we explore the emergence of online support groups through users' self-disclosure and social support mechanisms. Online debates and support mechanisms present a duality of both perils and possibilities within social media; perils of segregated communities and polarized debates, and possibilities of empathy narratives and self-help groups. This dichotomy also extends to a third perspective: users' reliance on AI-generated content, such as the ones produced by Large Language Models, which can manifest both human biases hidden in training sets and non-human biases that emerge from their artificial neural architectures. Analyzing interdisciplinary approaches, we aim to deepen the understanding of the complex interplay between social interactions, user-generated content, and biases within the realm of social media ecosystems.

Nicola Bena, Claudia Diamantini, Michela Natilli et al.

The proceedings of Workshop Scientific HPC in the pre-Exascale era (SHPC), held in Pisa, Italy, September 18, 2024, are part of 3rd Italian Conference on Big Data and Data Science (ITADATA2024) proceedings (arXiv: 2503.14937). The main objective of SHPC workshop was to discuss how the current most critical questions in HPC emerge in astrophysics, cosmology, and other scientific contexts and experiments. In particular, SHPC workshop focused on: $\bullet$ Scientific (mainly in astrophysical and medical fields) applications toward (pre-)Exascale computing $\bullet$ Performance portability $\bullet$ Green computing $\bullet$ Machine learning $\bullet$ Big Data management $\bullet$ Programming on heterogeneous architectures $\bullet$ Programming on accelerators $\bullet$ I/O techniques

Nicola Bena, Claudia Diamantini, Michela Natilli et al.

Proceedings of the 3rd Italian Conference on Big Data and Data Science (ITADATA2024), held in Pisa, Italy, September 17-19, 2024. The Italian Conference on Big Data and Data Science (ITADATA2024) is the annual event supported by the CINI Big Data National Laboratory and ISTI CNR that aims to put together Italian researchers and professionals from academia, industry, government, and public administration working in the field of big data and data science, as well as related fields (e.g., security and privacy, HPC, Cloud). ITADATA2024 covered research on all theoretical and practical aspects of Big Data and data science including data governance, data processing, data analysis, data reporting, data protection, as well as experimental studies and lessons learned. In particular, ITADATA2024 focused on - Data spaces - Data processing life cycle - Machine learning and Large Language Models - Applications of big data and data science in healthcare, finance, industry 5.0, and beyond - Data science for social network analysis

Luca Pappalardo, Salvatore Citraro, Giuliano Cornacchia et al.

Recommendation systems and assistants (in short, recommenders) influence through online platforms most actions of our daily lives, suggesting items or providing solutions based on users' preferences or requests. This survey systematically reviews, categories, and discusses the impact of recommenders in four human-AI ecosystems -- social media, online retail, urban mapping and generative AI ecosystems. Its scope is to systematise a fast-growing field in which terminologies employed to classify methodologies and outcomes are fragmented and unsystematic. This is a crucial contribution to the literature because terminologies vary substantially across disciplines and ecosystems, hindering comparison and accumulation of knowledge in the field. We follow the customary steps of qualitative systematic review, gathering 154 articles from different disciplines to develop a parsimonious taxonomy of methodologies employed (empirical, simulation, observational, controlled), outcomes observed (concentration, content degradation, discrimination, diversity, echo chamber, filter bubble, homogenisation, polarisation, radicalisation, volume), and their level of analysis (individual, item, and ecosystem). We systematically discuss substantive and methodological commonalities across ecosystems, and highlight potential avenues for future research. The survey is addressed to scholars and practitioners interested in different human-AI ecosystems, policymakers and institutional stakeholders who want to understand better the measurable outcomes of recommenders, and tech companies who wish to obtain a systematic view of the impact of their recommenders.