Andrew Mao

h-index6
2papers
132citations

2 Papers

1.2MED-PHNov 13, 2023
Bias-Reduced Neural Networks for Parameter Estimation in Quantitative MRI

Andrew Mao, Sebastian Flassbeck, Jakob Assländer

Purpose: To develop neural network (NN)-based quantitative MRI parameter estimators with minimal bias and a variance close to the Cramér-Rao bound. Theory and Methods: We generalize the mean squared error loss to control the bias and variance of the NN's estimates, which involves averaging over multiple noise realizations of the same measurements during training. Bias and variance properties of the resulting NNs are studied for two neuroimaging applications. Results: In simulations, the proposed strategy reduces the estimates' bias throughout parameter space and achieves a variance close to the Cramér-Rao bound. In vivo, we observe good concordance between parameter maps estimated with the proposed NNs and traditional estimators, such as non-linear least-squares fitting, while state-of-the-art NNs show larger deviations. Conclusion: The proposed NNs have greatly reduced bias compared to those trained using the mean squared error and offer significantly improved computational efficiency over traditional estimators with comparable or better accuracy.

5.9IROct 29, 2013
Capturing Variation and Uncertainty in Human Judgment

Andrew Mao, Hossein Azari Soufiani, Yiling Chen et al.

The well-studied problem of statistical rank aggregation has been applied to comparing sports teams, information retrieval, and most recently to data generated by human judgment. Such human-generated rankings may be substantially different from traditional statistical ranking data. In this work, we show that a recently proposed generalized random utility model reveals distinctive patterns in human judgment across three different domains, and provides a succinct representation of variance in both population preferences and imperfect perception. In contrast, we also show that classical statistical ranking models fail to capture important features from human-generated input. Our work motivates the use of more flexible ranking models for representing and describing the collective preferences or decision-making of human participants.