René Kizilcec

Jinsook Lee, AJ Alvero, Thorsten Joachims et al.

People are increasingly using technologies equipped with large language models (LLM) to write texts for formal communication, which raises two important questions at the intersection of technology and society: Who do LLMs write like (model alignment); and can LLMs be prompted to change who they write like (model steerability). We investigate these questions in the high-stakes context of undergraduate admissions at a selective university by comparing lexical and sentence variation between essays written by 30,000 applicants to two types of LLM-generated essays: one prompted with only the essay question used by the human applicants; and another with additional demographic information about each applicant. We consistently find that both types of LLM-generated essays are linguistically distinct from human-authored essays, regardless of the specific model and analytical approach. Further, prompting a specific sociodemographic identity is remarkably ineffective in aligning the model with the linguistic patterns observed in human writing from this identity group. This holds along the key dimensions of sex, race, first-generation status, and geographic location. The demographically prompted and unprompted synthetic texts were also more similar to each other than to the human text, meaning that prompting did not alleviate homogenization. These issues of model alignment and steerability in current LLMs raise concerns about the use of LLMs in high-stakes contexts.

Colleen Chan, Kisung You, Sunny Chung et al.

Applications of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have potential to enhance clinical decision support through conversational interfaces. However, challenges of human-algorithmic interaction and clinician trust are poorly understood. GutGPT, a LLM for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk prediction and management guidance, was deployed in clinical simulation scenarios alongside the electronic health record (EHR) with emergency medicine physicians, internal medicine physicians, and medical students to evaluate its effect on physician acceptance and trust in AI clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS). GutGPT provides risk predictions from a validated machine learning model and evidence-based answers by querying extracted clinical guidelines. Participants were randomized to GutGPT and an interactive dashboard, or the interactive dashboard and a search engine. Surveys and educational assessments taken before and after measured technology acceptance and content mastery. Preliminary results showed mixed effects on acceptance after using GutGPT compared to the dashboard or search engine but appeared to improve content mastery based on simulation performance. Overall, this study demonstrates LLMs like GutGPT could enhance effective AI-CDSS if implemented optimally and paired with interactive interfaces.

René Kizilcec, Kirk Vanacore, Zhuqian Zhou et al.

We introduce the Million Tutoring Moves (MTM) project, an open dataset initiative aimed at advancing the science of tutoring through large-scale, reusable, and multimodal interaction data. MTM is developed within the National Tutoring Observatory (NTO), a research infrastructure designed to study authentic tutoring interactions and translate them into actionable insights for research, practice, and AI-powered educational technology development. In this paper, we present the vision behind MTM and describe MTM v1, an initial release consisting of 4,654 math tutoring transcripts from a U.S.-based nonprofit online tutoring platform. MTM v1 serves as a first step toward a broader repository that is safe, open, large-scale, broad-coverage, and multimodal. By making tutoring interactions systematically observable and analyzable, MTM aims to support research on instructional processes, improve tutoring practice, and enable the development of AI systems grounded in real educational interactions.