Abtin Pourhadi

Pawel Batorski, Abtin Pourhadi, Jerzy Sarosiek et al.

Large language models are highly sensitive to prompts, but this sensitivity is usually studied through task-relevant instructions, demonstrations, or reasoning cues. In this paper, we study a different form of prompt sensitivity: whether prompts that are semantically unrelated to the task can nevertheless steer model behavior. We call them spurious prompts and show their surprising efficacy. We also propose a simple black-box search procedure for discovering them. Across reasoning and question-answering benchmarks, using models ranging from 0.8B to 27B parameters and spanning three model families, we show that spurious prompts can improve performance, often matching or outperforming standard prompting baselines and task-aware prompt optimization. We further show that they can steer models toward unintended behaviors, such as repeatedly selecting the first answer option, producing incorrect answers, returning an even, prime or small number without explicitly instructing the model to do so. These findings reveal a new kind of prompt sensitivity: LLMs can be systematically steered by prompts that are unrelated to the task they are asked to solve. Our code is available at https://github.com/Batorskq/spurious

Abtin Pourhadi, Paul Swoboda

We present a new state of the art approach for sparse keypoint matching between pairs of images. Our method consists of a fully deep learning based approach combining a visual backbone coupled with a SplineCNN graph neural network for feature processing and a normalized transformer decoder for decoding keypoint correspondences together with the Sinkhorn algorithm. Our method is trained using a contrastive and a hyperspherical loss for better feature representations. We additionally use data augmentation during training. This comparatively simple architecture combining extensive normalization and advanced losses outperforms current state of the art approaches on PascalVOC and SPair-71k datasets by $5.1\%$ and $2.2\%$ respectively compared to BBGM, ASAR, COMMON and GMTR while training for at least $1.7x$ fewer epochs.